Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Lateral violence among Indigenous Australians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity
Latest comment: 1 month ago by U3230258 in topic Feedback

Initial suggestions

[edit source]

@Smritiadhikari: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @smritiadhikari your book chapter is looking great! I just wanted to suggest for your case study to maybe include more specific details such as a specific job title and area that the work will be to create more realism.

Heading casing

[edit source]
Hi Smritiadhikari. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Promising 3-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement
  3. Simplify to a 2-level structure
  4. Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  5. The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
  6. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
  7. Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections
  1. Very good
  2. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  3. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  5. Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section
  2. Excellent use of citations
  3. Promising balance of theory and research
  4. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  5. Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  6. Use 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
  7. Use Australian spelling (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour)
  8. Conclusion is well developed
  9. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  4. Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view
  5. Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text
  1. Add in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question
  5. Embed the questions in relevant sections rather than having as a separate section
  6. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Good
  2. 5 out 6 references supplied
  3. Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
  4. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
  1. See also
    1. Very good
    2. Use sentence casing
    3. Some spaces were missing (fixed)
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Some spaces are missing
    3. Use alphabetical order
  1. Basic
  2. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

[edit source]

Hi @Smritiadhikari

I just read through your page and noticed that your not using wikiversity's quiz function for your quiz, i wanted to let you know that you can insert a quiz that can display your same true/false questions and automatically grade peoples answers.

Below I've included the wikiversity tutorial for the function

Help:Quiz-Simple

Best of luck on your chapter U3230258 (discusscontribs) 21:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply