Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Inner talk in achieving high performance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Suggestions

[edit source]

Hi Oscar,

Great topic and first scenario. Not sure why the image isn't displaying properly I had a quick look and everything seems ok. I inserted the same image I could see you tried to put in above your overview box.

I really like the focus questions that you have but I think the 3rd and 4th are going to a similar point being; how do you create positive self talk and how can you maintain it to your benefit?

You've gone straight for sports which is definitely what I would do. Perhaps it would be worth your while checking out other industries/ areas where there is high pressure in business, govt. or military?

I've been in the high performance sport area getting on for 10 years now so if you wanted to chat I'd be happy to.

Good luck.

Ari --Ubaldo111 (discusscontribs) 07:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey!, I found a source that might be useful for chapter if you would like to use it. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2048 U3230258 (discusscontribs) 22:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for larger section(s)
  2. Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Basic
  2. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  3. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  4. Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
  1. Partial development of key points
  2. Basic use of citations
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  5. Consider using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression such as checking grammatical and spelling errors
  6. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed
  7. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text (e.g., how does the Michael Jordan image fit with "inner talk"?)
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. Add in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Excellent use of one or more tables
  5. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. Excellent
  2. Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
  1. See also
    1. One of two link types provided
      1. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
    2. Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters)
  2. External links
    1. Good
    2. Use sentence casing
    3. Include source in brackets after link
  1. Good
  2. Basic
  3. Description about self provided
  4. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  5. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

General feedback

[edit source]

Hey!

Here are some suggestions for your chapter:

The introduction with Michael Jordan’s “Flu Game” is a great hook. Clearly explain why inner dialogue is important and how it relates to high performance to help readers understand its significance.

For the focus questions, ensure they are clear and directly related to the content. For example, ask, “What are the different types of inner talk, and how do they impact motivation and performance?” This will guide the reader through the chapter. U3219927 (discusscontribs) 11:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a basic presentation
  2. The presentation is over the maximum time limit. Content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes.
  1. The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a basic way
  2. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest (e.g., through an example)
  3. A basic context for the presentation is established
  4. Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented
  5. Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes insufficient use of relevant psychological research
  6. The presentation makes insufficient use of citations to support claims
  7. The presentation makes insufficient/no use of examples
  8. The presentation provides useful/good/basic practical advice
  9. The presentation could be improved by providing practical advice
  10. The presentation provides easy to understand information
  11. Provide easy to understand information
  1. The conclusion provides a basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic
  2. The conclusion provides very good take-home message(s)
  3. The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
  1. The presentation makes reasonably good use of narrated audio
  2. Audio communication is well-paced
  3. Very good intonation
  4. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  5. Audio recording quality was basic
  6. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality
  7. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone.
  8. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic
  1. Overall, visual display quality is basic
  2. The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides
  3. Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read
  4. The amount of text presented on one or more slides could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time
  5. The visual communication is supplemented in basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams
  6. The presentation is basically produced using simple tools
  7. The visual content is well matched to the target topic
  1. The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A reasonably good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. A link to the book chapter is not provided
  4. A link from the book chapter is provided
  5. The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. Provide clickable links to the image sources and license details (e.g., in the description)
  3. A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing

[edit source]
FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply


Book chapter review and feedback

[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a very good to excellent chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
  3. Over the maximum word count. Content beyond 4,000 words has been ignored for marking purposes.
  4. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
  1. Very good
  2. Engaging case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image
  3. Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon
  4. The focus questions are excellent
  1. An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. Builds on two previous chapters and/or Wikipedia articles
  3. Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  4. Promising use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  5. Key citations are well used
  6. Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
  1. Excellent review of relevant research
  2. Reasonably good critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  3. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. considering the strength of relationships
    3. acknowledging limitations
    4. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
    5. suggesting specific directions for future research
  1. Excellent integration between theory and research
  1. Very good summary and conclusion
  2. There is some excessive, over the word count key point material
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
    2. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
  2. Layout
    1. The structure is overly complicated; aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Introduction and Conclusion
    2. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
    3. See earlier comments about heading casing
    4. Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
  3. Grammar
    1. Check and correct use of affect vs. effect
  4. APA style
    1. Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.
    2. Use serial commas[2][3]
    3. Figures
      1. Briefly captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text
      2. Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example.
    4. Tables
      1. Use APA style for captions (see example)
      2. Refer to each Table using APA style (e.g., do not use bold, talics, check and correct capitalisation)
    5. Citations use very good APA Style (7th ed.):
      1. Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses
    6. References use reasonably good APA style:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation[4]
      2. Include hyperlinked dois (fixed)
      3. Use hanging indent (fixed)
  1. Reasonably good use of learning features
  2. One use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Basic use of figure(s)
  5. Basic use of table(s)
  6. Basic use of feature box(es)
  7. Excellent use of scenarios, case studies, or examples
  8. Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  9. Use the quiz tool to improve plain text quiz questions and make them more interactive
  10. Insufficient use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
    1. Include sources in parentheses after the link
    2. Add more links
  11. Basic use of external links in the "External links" section
    1. Use sentence casing
    2. Use alphabetical order
    3. Add more links
  1. No logged contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply