Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Humour and social bonding

social bonding idea

You could possibly talk about Indigenous "yarning" for social bonding if you wish. This could be somewhere to start: https://www.unsw.edu.au/canberra/about-us/equity-diversity-inclusion/unsw-canberra-community-circle Chris Beaven (discuss • contribs) 08:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that could be a good way to incorporate a cultural reference that is relevant here in Australia.

Generally, I think the structure is clear and the way you've introduced and explored this topic is relatable and useful. I especially enjoyed the lift scenario as I feel many of us have been here. U3081293 (discuss • contribs) 12:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Using quizzes and images

Hi there, I've read through your chapter and it looks like you have some great ideas! You include many different types of humour and psychological theories in your chapter, so I thought that using a quiz towards the end might be a fun way for readers to consolidate this knowledge and make sure they can distinguish between the multiple theories discussed. If you need a template for a quiz, you can look at the edit source page of my chapter and use that if you want to. The use of images throughout the sections of your chapter could also be a useful addition, as it adds some more colour and excitement for the reader to look at as they go through your chapter. Great work so far! --U3236447 (discuss • contribs) 03:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further refinement The draft headings place too much emphasis on background concepts and too little on the relationship between the concepts Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Definition(s) tend to be pedestrian headings. Incorporate definitional material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information. 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to help catch reader interest A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Only one of the focus questions directly relates to the topic (see sub-title). Expand on this focus question. 4. Key points Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples Conclusion (the most important section): Underway 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2) Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Very good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: italicisation make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) 8. Resources See also OK Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters) Use alphabetical order External links OK Move academic sources into references and cite in the chapter Only include links directly related to the sub-title Use alphabetical order 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with indirect link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making: comments on the talk pages of other chapters (past or current) posts about the unit or project on other platforms such as the UCLearn discussion forum or on X using the #emot24 To add direct links to evidence: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi Lwinter1. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation Overview The opening slide(s) clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses/somewhat addresses/does not adequately address the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes very good use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples The presentation provides useful practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides basic take-home message(s) Audio The presentation makes reasonably good use of narrated audio Audio communication is reasonably well-paced Basic intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was basic Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is reasonably good The presentation makes reasonably good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is reasonably well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation An excellent written description of the presentation is provided An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. I suspect that some of this chapter is based on unacknowledged use of genAI output; if so, it violates academic integrity principles Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Move embedded external links to academic articles into the References section, include links as dois, and provide APA style citation to the article in the main body text For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon The focus questions are clear and relevant Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on other chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Some use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Very good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Very good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Very good integration between theory and research Conclusion Reasonably good summary and conclusion Reads like generic genAI output; write more compellingly in your own words Remind the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest Address the focus questions Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Use active (e.g., "this chapter explores") rather than passive voice (e.g., "this chapter has explored" or "this chapter will explore") [1][2] Avoid one sentence paragraphs. Communicate one idea per paragraph using three to five sentences. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[3] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Grammar Check and make correct use of commas (sometimes they were missing) Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[4] The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Abbreviations Check and correct use of abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., etc.) Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour; humor vs. humour) Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Figures Very well/Well/Reasonably well captioned Briefly captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text Add captions Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., "(see Figure 1)"; do not use bold, italics, check and correct capitalisation). Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., "(see Figure 1)") Some image uploads were removed because of a lack of sufficient/appropriate copyright information Numbering needs correcting Increase some image sizes to make them easier to read Tables Use APA style for captions (see example) Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1) Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.) Move embedded links to peer reviewed sources into the References as APA style citations with hyperlinked dois References use very good APA style: Check and correct use of italicisation Use the simplest URLs (i.e., the dois). Note that links like this https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/41/5/1153/2962088?redirectedFrom=PDF&casa_token=B2CxMOfj8-cAAAAA:Jazao2IbDC7LR7xdyRnkAr0GWDSvzJMLs20ZNjd3Qy_zwtT7gOn6diGOPoXhgtKwTEhoR0Pa3BmyYg, if they are to be used, should be abbreviated at least to https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/41/5/1153/2962088 Learning features Excellent use of learning features Basic use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of figure(s) Reasonably good use of table(s) Reasonably good use of feature box(es) Reasonably good use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Use alphabetical order Social contribution ~5 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess. See tutorials for guidance about how to get direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)