Jump to content

Template:METF/2025

From Wikiversity
(Redirected from Template:METF)

Feedback template for the topic development exercise for motivation and emotion. Transclude on a chapter talk page.

Simple example

Simple example

[edit source]

See also detailed example

<!-- Official topic development feedback -->
{{METF/2025
|1=
<!-- Title -->
#
|2=
<!-- Headings -->
#
|3=
<!-- Overview -->
#
|4=
<!-- Key points-->
#
|5=
<!-- Figure -->
#
|6=
<!-- Learning feature -->
#
|7=
<!-- References -->
#
|8=
<!-- Resources -->
#
|9=
<!-- User page -->
#
|10=
<!-- Social contribution -->
#
}}
~~~~

gives

Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the plan. If you don't understand the feedback or would like further information, get in touch to discuss. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:42, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Detailed example

[edit source]

Example use of the template which includes commonly used feedback comments:

<!-- Official topic development feedback -->
{{METF/2025
|1=
<!-- Title -->
# Title and sub-title correctly worded and use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
# Title and/or sub-title not correctly worded and/or didn't use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]] (fixed)
# User name removed from the page; for authorship see [[Special:History/{{PAGENAME}}|the page's edit history]]
|2=
<!-- Headings -->
# See earlier comment about [[#heading casing|heading casing]]
<!-- Heading structure -->
# Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic.
# Clear 2-level heading structure
# Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement
# Basic 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
# Promising 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (e.g., consider using subheadings)
# Basic, 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure (i.e., use subheadings)
# Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for larger section(s) (i.e., including subheadings)
# The headings lack sufficient incision into, and exposition of, the topic
# Overly complicated 3-level structure – consider simplifying
# Revise heading structure to place less emphasis on background concepts and more emphasis on the target topic (i.e., address the sub-title). The draft headings place too much emphasis on background concepts and too little on the relationship between the concepts.
# Messy heading structure – needs work (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 2]])
<!-- Alignment with focus questions -->
# Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
# Very good alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure, but there may be room for improvement
# Good alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure, but there is room for improvement
# Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but aim for closer alignment
# Basic alignment between between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings. Aim to improve.
# Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
# Insufficient alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
<!-- Other --->
# Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with 3 to 5 sub-headings for large sections
# The Overview and Conclusion should not use sub-headings
# Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid additional formatting such as bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
# Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
# "Introduction" heading isn't necessary – provide this information in Overview or move into subsequent sections
# Cover definition(s) in the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information
# Case study doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed case study within relevant sections
# Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections
# Check grammar (e.g,. missing question mark)
# Remove [[wikt:acronym#Noun|acronym]]s from headings
# Remove citations from headings
<!-- GenAI --->
# Are the headings based on [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI|genAI content]]? If so, this needs to be acknowledged in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
|3=
<!-- Overview-->
# Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
# Very good
# Good
# Basic
# Insufficient
# Hasn't been developed – Needs scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
<!-- GenAI --->
# Does this section include [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI|genAI content]]? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
<!-- Scenario -->
# A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
# A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section; I moved an image into the feature box to help attract reader interest
# A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section; add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest
# Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help engage reader interest
# A scenario or case study is planned
# Add a scenario or case study in a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help engage reader interest
<!-- Description -->
# A clear description of the problem/topic is planned or presented
# A promising description of the problem/topic is planned or presented
# A basic description of the problem/topic is planned or presented
# Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic. Move detail into subsequent sections.
# Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
<!-- Style -->
# Use present, rather than future, tense
# Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios)
<!-- Focus questions -->
# Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
# Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment
# Develop closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
# Use open- rather then close-ended focus questions
# Use single- rather than double-barrelled focus questions
# Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
# Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
|4=
<!-- Key points-->
<!-- Overall -->
# Excellent – key points are well developed for each section
# Solid development
# Promising development
# Overly broad/comprehensive; not sufficiently focused/targetted on the topic; this often occurs when genAI content is used by a prompter with insufficient background reading and understanding of the topic and/or insufficient revising and rewriting of genAI content
# Basic development
# Partial development
# Insufficient development
# No development
<!-- Scope -->
# The scope is excellent (i.e., not too little/narrow or too big/broad)
# It may be that all planned aspects cannot be reasonably covered within the book chapter word count, so be selective and concentrate on key aspects that address the question in the sub-title
# It is unlikely that all planned aspects can be reasonably covered within the book chapter word count, so be selective and concentrate on the most important aspects which address the question in the sub-title
# All planned aspects cannot reasonably be covered within the book chapter word count, so be selective and concentrate on the most important aspects which  address the question in the sub-title
<!-- Writing style -->
# The writing style is clear and easy to follow
# The writing style is generally clear but could be simplified or made more concise
# The writing style is difficult to follow (e.g., due to vagueness, complex wording, long sentences, long paragraphs, repetition, etc.)
<!-- Theory and research -->
# Good balance of theory and research
# Promising balance of theory and research
# Reasonably good coverage of theory; strive to balance the theoretical content with critical review of relevant research
# Too much theory. Not enough research. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples. 
# Select the best theories about this topic
# Select the best research about this topic
<!-- Citations -->
# Excellent use of citations
# Very good use of citations
# Good use of citations
# Basic use of citations
# Insufficient use of citations
# Non-peer-reviewed sources should be moved to the "External links" section
# Tip: Rather than starting with an author name and citation, start with the more interesting part (i.e., the substance) and put the citation at the end or mid-way through the sentence
<!-- Citation style -->
# Use [https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/basic-principles APA style 7th edition for citations] (e.g., do not include author initials)
# Use [https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/basic-principles APA style 7th edition for citations] with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year)
# [https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/punctuation/serial-comma APA style uses serial commas][[w:Serial comma|1]][https://www.buzzfeed.com/adamdavis/the-oxford-comma-is-extremely-important-and-everyone-should 2][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBx8ooDupXY 3] (1 min)
<!-- Other -->
# For sections with sub-sections, provide key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
# ''Avoid providing too much background information''. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Focus most of the chapter on ''directly answering the core question(s)'' posed by the chapter sub-title.
# Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, express the idea in your own words
# Use correct capitalisation ([https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/capitalization APA style is a "down" style]) – [https://polishedpaper.com/blog/capitalization-apa-style more info]
# Use [https://www.aresearchguide.com/write-in-third-person.html 3rd person perspective], although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
# Use [https://www.abc.net.au/education/learn-english/australian-vs-american-spelling/11244196 Australian spelling] (e.g., analyze → analyse; behavior → behaviour)
# Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
# Consider using the [https://unicanberra.instructure.com/courses/15707/external_tools/262?display=borderless Studiosity] service and/or a service like [https://www.grammarly.com/ Grammarly] to help improve the quality of written expression and to check grammatical and spelling errors
<!-- GenAI --->
# Well done on acknowledging genAI use in the edit summary. Also share link(s) to the conversation, as per the [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI|using genAI guidelines]].
# Do these key points include [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI|genAI content]]? If so, this needs to be acknowledged in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
<!-- Conclusion -->
# Conclusion is well developed
# Conclusion is well underway
# Conclusion is underway
# Conclusion is underdeveloped
# Conclusion hasn't been developed
# What are the practical, take-home messages? (address the focus questions)
|5=
<!-- Figure -->
# Excellent - Relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited
# Relevant figure(s) are presented and captioned
# Relevant figure(s) are presented
# The relevance of the figure to the topic is unclear
# A relevant figure is not presented and cited (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 2]])
<!-- Caption -->
# Figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
# Figure caption(s) provide(s) a reasonably clear description that is connected with the main text
# Figure caption(s) provide(s) a somewhat clear description that is connected with the main text, but could be improved
# Figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
# Figure caption(s) should include '''Figure X'''. ...
<!-- Cite -->
# Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
# Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
<!-- Size -->
# Consider increasing image size(s) (especially if they have text) to make them easier to view
# Consider decreasing image size(s) to make them less dominant
<!-- Creation -->
# Well done on creating and uploading your own image! {{smile}} – this can also be listed as a social contribution
|6=
<!-- Learning feature -->
<!-- Interwiki links --->
# Excellent in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for first mention of key terms to [[w:|Wikipedia]] and/or [[Motivation and emotion/Book|book chapters]]
# Promising in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for first mention of key terms to [[w:|Wikipedia]] and/or [[Motivation and emotion/Book|book chapters]]
# Two in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for first mention of key terms to [[w:|Wikipedia]]. Also embed links to [[Motivation and emotion/Book|book chapters]].
# One in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki link]] for first mention of key term to [[w:|Wikipedia]]. Also embed links to [[Motivation and emotion/Book|book chapters]].
# Add in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for first mention of key terms to [[w:|Wikipedia]] and/or [[Motivation and emotion/Book|book chapters]] (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 2]])
<!-- Scenarios/examples/case studies -->
# Excellent use of scenarios/examples/case studies
# Promising use of scenarios/examples/case studies
# Keep scenarios brief 
# Basic use of scenario/example/case study
# Placeholder use of scenarios/examples/case studies
# Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies 
<!-- Quiz -->
# Excellent use of quiz question(s)
# Promising use of quiz question(s)
# Placeholder use of quiz question(s)
# Place quiz each question in the most relevant section
# Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages
# Consider including quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
<!-- Tables -->
# Excellent use of table(s)
# Promising use of table(s)
# Use APA style for table captions
# Add table caption
# Cite each table at least once in the text
# Include citations for sources of information presented in the table
# Also consider using tables to summarise key information
|7=
<!-- References -->
<!-- Overall -->
# Excellent
# Very good
# Good
# Basic
# Insufficient
# To be developed
<!-- Systematic reviews -->
# Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
# At least one relevant systematic review and/or meta-analysis has been identified
# What are the most relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses about this topic?
<!-- Move -->
# Move Wikipedia links to the "See also" section
# Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to the "External links" section
<!-- Citations -->
# All references need in-text citation
# All citations need to be in the References
# Only include references which have been accessed and read
<!-- APA style -->
# Check and correct [https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf APA referencing style]:
## alphabetical order
## capitalisation
## [[Help:Wikitext quick reference|italicisation]]
## [https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf doi formatting]
## make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
## use dois where available instead of other links
## include hyperlinked dois
## page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
# A more thorough literature search is recommended. The goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
# Use APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both (currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used
# Don't cite AI-generated content because it is unreliable and not peer-reviewed. Instead, follow the [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI|using genAI guidelines]] which include acknowledging and linking to genAI use in edit summaries, otherwise it is a violation of academic integrity.
|8=
<!-- Resources -->
<!-- See also -->
# See also
## Excellent
## Very good
## Good
## Basic
## To be developed (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 2]])
## One of two link types provided
### Also link to related [[Motivation and emotion/Book|motivation and emotion book chapters]]
### Also link to relevant [[w:|Wikipedia]] pages
## Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
## Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters)
## Use alphabetical order
<!-- External links -->
# External links
## Excellent
## Very good
## Good
## Basic
## One of two required external links provided
## To be developed (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 2]])
## Move Wikipedia link(s) to the "See also" section
## Move academic sources into the "References" sections and provide in-text citation
## Only include links directly related to the sub-title
## Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
## Good choice of links, but poorly formatted (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
## Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Include source in brackets after link
## Use alphabetical order
## Link to the most relevant external resources about this topic
|9=
<!-- User page -->
# Excellent
# Used effectively
# Very good
# Good
# Basic
# Not created – see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]
<!-- Description about self -->
# Excellent description about self provided
# Description about self provided
# Brief description about self – consider expanding
# Very brief description about self – consider expanding
# Add description about self
<!-- Links to profile(s) -->
# Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
# Consider linking to your [https://portfolio.canberra.edu.au/ eportfolio] page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as [https://www.linkedin.com/ LinkedIn]. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
<!-- Link to book chapter -->
# A link to the book chapter is provided
# Rename the link to the book chapter to make it more user-friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
# Add link to book chapter
|10=
<!-- Social contribution -->
# Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
# Good – two out of three types of contributions made with direct link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making:
# One out of three types of contributions made with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making:
#* direct improvements to other [[Motivation and emotion/Book|chapters (past or current)]]
#* comments on the [[Help:Talk page|talk page]]s of other [[Motivation and emotion/Book|chapters (past or current)]]
#* posts about the unit or project on the {{Motivation and emotion/Canvas}} discussion forum
# None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing#Social contributions|Tutorial 02]]). Looking ahead to the book chapter, see [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#Socialcontribution|social contributions]].
# To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#Making and summarising social contributions|Making and summarising social contributions]]. This was demonstrated in [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing#Social contributions|Tutorial 02]].
# Are these contributions based on AI-generated content? If so, please follow the [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI|using genAI guidelines]], otherwise it is a violation of academic integrity.
# Well done on creating and uploading your own image!
# Use a numbered list (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
# Descriptions of contributions could be more precise/accurate/detailed
# Add a brief summary of each contribution
# Remember to sign comments on talk pages
}}
~~~~

gives

Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the plan. If you don't understand the feedback or would like further information, get in touch to discuss. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. Title and sub-title correctly worded and use sentence casing
  2. Title and/or sub-title not correctly worded and/or didn't use sentence casing (fixed)
  3. User name removed from the page; for authorship see the page's edit history
  1. See earlier comment about heading casing
  2. Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic.
  3. Clear 2-level heading structure
  4. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement
  5. Basic 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
  6. Promising 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (e.g., consider using subheadings)
  7. Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for larger section(s) (i.e., including subheadings)
  8. The headings lack sufficient incision into, and exposition of, the topic
  9. Overly complicated 3-level structure – consider simplifying
  10. Revise heading structure to place less emphasis on background concepts and more emphasis on the target topic (i.e., address the sub-title). The draft headings place too much emphasis on background concepts and too little on the relationship between the concepts.
  11. Messy heading structure – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  12. Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
  13. Very good alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure, but there may be room for improvement
  14. Good alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure, but there is room for improvement
  15. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but aim for closer alignment
  16. Basic alignment between between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings. Aim to improve.
  17. Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  18. Insufficient alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  19. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with 3 to 5 sub-headings for large sections
  20. The Overview and Conclusion should not use sub-headings
  21. Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid additional formatting such as bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
  22. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
  23. "Introduction" heading isn't necessary – provide this information in Overview or move into subsequent sections
  24. Cover definition(s) in the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information
  25. Case study doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed case study within relevant sections
  26. Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections
  27. Check grammar (e.g,. missing question mark)
  28. Remove acronyms from headings
  29. Remove citations from headings
  30. Are the headings based on genAI content? If so, this needs to be acknowledged in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  1. Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. Basic
  5. Insufficient
  6. Hasn't been developed – Needs scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
  7. Does this section include genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  8. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
  9. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section; I moved an image into the feature box to help attract reader interest
  10. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section; add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest
  11. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help engage reader interest
  12. A scenario or case study is planned
  13. Add a scenario or case study in a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help engage reader interest
  14. A clear description of the problem/topic is planned or presented
  15. A promising description of the problem/topic is planned or presented
  16. A basic description of the problem/topic is planned or presented
  17. Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic. Move detail into subsequent sections.
  18. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  19. Use present, rather than future, tense
  20. Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios)
  21. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  22. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment
  23. Develop closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  24. Use open- rather then close-ended focus questions
  25. Use single- rather than double-barrelled focus questions
  26. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
  27. Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section
  2. Solid development
  3. Promising development
  4. Overly broad/comprehensive; not sufficiently focused/targetted on the topic; this often occurs when genAI content is used by a prompter with insufficient background reading and understanding of the topic and/or insufficient revising and rewriting of genAI content
  5. Basic development
  6. Partial development
  7. Insufficient development
  8. No development
  9. The scope is excellent (i.e., not too little/narrow or too big/broad)
  10. It may be that all planned aspects cannot be reasonably covered within the book chapter word count, so be selective and concentrate on key aspects that address the question in the sub-title
  11. It is unlikely that all planned aspects can be reasonably covered within the book chapter word count, so be selective and concentrate on the most important aspects which address the question in the sub-title
  12. All planned aspects cannot reasonably be covered within the book chapter word count, so be selective and concentrate on the most important aspects which address the question in the sub-title
  13. The writing style is clear and easy to follow
  14. The writing style is generally clear but could be simplified or made more concise
  15. The writing style is difficult to follow (e.g., due to vagueness, complex wording, long sentences, long paragraphs, repetition, etc.)
  16. Good balance of theory and research
  17. Promising balance of theory and research
  18. Reasonably good coverage of theory; strive to balance the theoretical content with critical review of relevant research
  19. Too much theory. Not enough research. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples.
  20. Select the best theories about this topic
  21. Select the best research about this topic
  22. Excellent use of citations
  23. Very good use of citations
  24. Good use of citations
  25. Basic use of citations
  26. Insufficient use of citations
  27. Non-peer-reviewed sources should be moved to the "External links" section
  28. Tip: Rather than starting with an author name and citation, start with the more interesting part (i.e., the substance) and put the citation at the end or mid-way through the sentence
  29. Use APA style 7th edition for citations (e.g., do not include author initials)
  30. Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year)
  31. APA style uses serial commas123 (1 min)
  32. For sections with sub-sections, provide key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  33. Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Focus most of the chapter on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  34. Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, express the idea in your own words
  35. Use correct capitalisation (APA style is a "down" style) – more info
  36. Use 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
  37. Use Australian spelling (e.g., analyze → analyse; behavior → behaviour)
  38. Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
  39. Consider using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression and to check grammatical and spelling errors
  40. Well done on acknowledging genAI use in the edit summary. Also share link(s) to the conversation, as per the using genAI guidelines.
  41. Do these key points include genAI content? If so, this needs to be acknowledged in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  42. Conclusion is well developed
  43. Conclusion is well underway
  44. Conclusion is underway
  45. Conclusion is underdeveloped
  46. Conclusion hasn't been developed
  47. What are the practical, take-home messages? (address the focus questions)
  1. Excellent - Relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited
  2. Relevant figure(s) are presented and captioned
  3. Relevant figure(s) are presented
  4. The relevance of the figure to the topic is unclear
  5. A relevant figure is not presented and cited (see Tutorial 2)
  6. Figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  7. Figure caption(s) provide(s) a reasonably clear description that is connected with the main text
  8. Figure caption(s) provide(s) a somewhat clear description that is connected with the main text, but could be improved
  9. Figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  10. Figure caption(s) should include Figure X. ...
  11. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  12. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  13. Consider increasing image size(s) (especially if they have text) to make them easier to view
  14. Consider decreasing image size(s) to make them less dominant
  15. Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution
  1. Excellent in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia and/or book chapters
  2. Promising in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia and/or book chapters
  3. Two in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia. Also embed links to book chapters.
  4. One in-text interwiki link for first mention of key term to Wikipedia. Also embed links to book chapters.
  5. Add in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia and/or book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  6. Excellent use of scenarios/examples/case studies
  7. Promising use of scenarios/examples/case studies
  8. Keep scenarios brief
  9. Basic use of scenario/example/case study
  10. Placeholder use of scenarios/examples/case studies
  11. Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies
  12. Excellent use of quiz question(s)
  13. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  14. Placeholder use of quiz question(s)
  15. Place quiz each question in the most relevant section
  16. Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages
  17. Consider including quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  18. Excellent use of table(s)
  19. Promising use of table(s)
  20. Use APA style for table captions
  21. Add table caption
  22. Cite each table at least once in the text
  23. Include citations for sources of information presented in the table
  24. Also consider using tables to summarise key information
  1. Excellent
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. Basic
  5. Insufficient
  6. To be developed
  7. Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
  8. At least one relevant systematic review and/or meta-analysis has been identified
  9. What are the most relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses about this topic?
  10. Move Wikipedia links to the "See also" section
  11. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to the "External links" section
  12. All references need in-text citation
  13. All citations need to be in the References
  14. Only include references which have been accessed and read
  15. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. alphabetical order
    2. capitalisation
    3. italicisation
    4. doi formatting
    5. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    6. use dois where available instead of other links
    7. include hyperlinked dois
    8. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  16. A more thorough literature search is recommended. The goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  17. Use APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both (currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used
  18. Don't cite AI-generated content because it is unreliable and not peer-reviewed. Instead, follow the using genAI guidelines which include acknowledging and linking to genAI use in edit summaries, otherwise it is a violation of academic integrity.
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Very good
    3. Good
    4. Basic
    5. To be developed (see Tutorial 2)
    6. One of two link types provided
      1. Also link to related motivation and emotion book chapters
      2. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
    7. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    8. Use sentence casing
    9. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    10. Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters)
    11. Use alphabetical order
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Very good
    3. Good
    4. Basic
    5. One of two required external links provided
    6. To be developed (see Tutorial 2)
    7. Move Wikipedia link(s) to the "See also" section
    8. Move academic sources into the "References" sections and provide in-text citation
    9. Only include links directly related to the sub-title
    10. Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
    11. Good choice of links, but poorly formatted (see Tutorial 02)
    12. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    13. Use sentence casing
    14. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    15. Include source in brackets after link
    16. Use alphabetical order
    17. Link to the most relevant external resources about this topic
  1. Excellent
  2. Used effectively
  3. Very good
  4. Good
  5. Basic
  6. Not created – see Tutorial 02
  7. Excellent description about self provided
  8. Description about self provided
  9. Brief description about self – consider expanding
  10. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  11. Add description about self
  12. Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
  13. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  14. A link to the book chapter is provided
  15. Rename the link to the book chapter to make it more user-friendly (see Tutorial 02)
  16. Add link to book chapter
  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. Good – two out of three types of contributions made with direct link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making:
  3. One out of three types of contributions made with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making:
  4. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 02). Looking ahead to the book chapter, see social contributions.
  5. To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. This was demonstrated in Tutorial 02.
  6. Are these contributions based on AI-generated content? If so, please follow the using genAI guidelines, otherwise it is a violation of academic integrity.
  7. Well done on creating and uploading your own image!
  8. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)
  9. Descriptions of contributions could be more precise/accurate/detailed
  10. Add a brief summary of each contribution
  11. Remember to sign comments on talk pages

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:42, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

See also

[edit source]