Template:Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Multimedia/Feedback/2021

From Wikiversity
(Redirected from Template:MEMF)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Marking and feedback template for the multimedia presentation exercise for Motivation and emotion, 2021. Designed to be transcluded on a chapter talk page.

Simple example

Usage - Default example[edit source]

{{MEMF/2021
|1=
|2=
|3=
|4=
|5=
|6=
|7=
|8=
}}
~~~~

creates:

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit source]

Overview[edit source]

Content[edit source]

Conclusion[edit source]

Audio[edit source]

Video[edit source]

Meta-data[edit source]

Licensing[edit source]

Detailed example[edit source]

This is the template syntax with some prefilled comments:

{{MEMF/2021
|1=
<!-- Overall -->
# Overall, this is an excellent/very good/reasonably good/basic presentation.
# Overall, this is an insufficient presentation.
# Overall, this is an insufficient presentation mainly because it presents too much content visually and auditorily.
# The presentation is over the maximum time limit - content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes.
|2=
<!-- Overview -->
# Add and narrate an initial title/sub-title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation.
# Consider adding and narrating an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered.
|3=
<!-- Content -->
# Comments about the book chapter also apply to this section.
# An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
# There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
# This presentation doesn't adequately address the topic.
# The presentation is well structured.
# The presentation is poorly structured.
# The selection of content is poor because it doesn't adequately use the most relevant psychological theory and/or research to address the topic.
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/basic/little/no use of relevant psychological theory.
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/basic/little/no use of relevant psychological research.
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice.
# The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies.
|4=
<!-- Conclusion -->
# A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s).
# What are the practical take-home message(s) that we can use to help improve our everyday lives based on the best available psychological theory and research about this topic?
# The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages.
# The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit.
|5=
<!-- Audio -->
# The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to.
# The audio is easy to follow.
# The audio is hard to follow because so much content is presented so quickly.
# The presentation makes effective/basic use of narrated audio.
# Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
# Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
# Excellent/Consider using greater [[w:Intonation (linguistics)|intonation]] to enhance listener interest and engagement.
# Consider improving [[w:Articulatory phonetics|articulation]] to enhance the clarity of speech.
# The audio communication is hesitant - could benefit from further practice.
# Audio recording quality was excellent/very good/good/poor (e.g., quiet, tinny, white noise, keyboard clicks audible). Probably an on-board microphone was used. Consider using an external microphone.
# Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio.
|6=
<!-- Video -->
# The presentation makes effective/basic use of animated slides.
# The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides.
# The presentation makes basic use of text based slides.
# The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
# Some of the font size should be larger to make it easier to read.
# The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.
# The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images.
# The usability of the video could be improved by exporting to a commonly used video hosting platform such as [https://www.youtube.com/ YouTube] or [https://vimeo.com/ Vimeo].
# The video is very well produced.
# The video is well produced using simple tools.
# The video is basically produced using simple tools.
# [https://www.lifewire.com/hide-sound-icon-on-powerpoint-slides-2767122 Hide the audio icon].
# The video is poorly produced and lacks the polish that comes with practice.
# The chapter title and sub-title are used on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# The sub-title is missing on the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# Use the chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# Visual display quality was excellent/very good/good/basic.
|7=
<!-- Meta-data -->
# The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# The chapter title but not the sub-title are used in the name of presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# The sub-title is missing in the video title - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# The wording and/or formatting/grammar of the title/sub-title is inconsistent between the name of the video, the opening slide, and/or the book chapter.
# A written description of the presentation is provided.
# A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
# A link to the book chapter is provided.
# A link to the book chapter is provided but it goes to a specific section rather than the top of the chapter.
# A link from the book chapter is provided.
|8=
<!-- Licensing -->
# Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Either provide details about the image sources and their copyright licenses in the video description or remove the presentation.
# This presentation has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement.
# A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
# A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the [https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/57404?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en meta-data].
}}
~~~~

creates:

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent/very good/reasonably good/basic presentation.
  2. Overall, this is an insufficient presentation.
  3. Overall, this is an insufficient presentation mainly because it presents too much content visually and auditorily.
  4. The presentation is over the maximum time limit - content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes.

Overview[edit source]

  1. Add and narrate an initial title/sub-title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation.
  2. Consider adding and narrating an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered.

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter also apply to this section.
  2. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
  3. There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
  4. This presentation doesn't adequately address the topic.
  5. The presentation is well structured.
  6. The presentation is poorly structured.
  7. The selection of content is poor because it doesn't adequately use the most relevant psychological theory and/or research to address the topic.
  8. The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/basic/little/no use of relevant psychological theory.
  9. The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/basic/little/no use of relevant psychological research.
  10. The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice.
  11. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s).
  2. What are the practical take-home message(s) that we can use to help improve our everyday lives based on the best available psychological theory and research about this topic?
  3. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages.
  4. The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit.

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to.
  2. The audio is easy to follow.
  3. The audio is hard to follow because so much content is presented so quickly.
  4. The presentation makes effective/basic use of narrated audio.
  5. Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  6. Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  7. Excellent/Consider using greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement.
  8. Consider improving articulation to enhance the clarity of speech.
  9. The audio communication is hesitant - could benefit from further practice.
  10. Audio recording quality was excellent/very good/good/poor (e.g., quiet, tinny, white noise, keyboard clicks audible). Probably an on-board microphone was used. Consider using an external microphone.
  11. Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio.

Video[edit source]

  1. The presentation makes effective/basic use of animated slides.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides.
  3. The presentation makes basic use of text based slides.
  4. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  5. Some of the font size should be larger to make it easier to read.
  6. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.
  7. The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images.
  8. The usability of the video could be improved by exporting to a commonly used video hosting platform such as YouTube or Vimeo.
  9. The video is very well produced.
  10. The video is well produced using simple tools.
  11. The video is basically produced using simple tools.
  12. Hide the audio icon.
  13. The video is poorly produced and lacks the polish that comes with practice.
  14. The chapter title and sub-title are used on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  15. The sub-title is missing on the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  16. Use the chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  17. Visual display quality was excellent/very good/good/basic.

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. The chapter title but not the sub-title are used in the name of presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  3. The sub-title is missing in the video title - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  4. The wording and/or formatting/grammar of the title/sub-title is inconsistent between the name of the video, the opening slide, and/or the book chapter.
  5. A written description of the presentation is provided.
  6. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  7. A link to the book chapter is provided.
  8. A link to the book chapter is provided but it goes to a specific section rather than the top of the chapter.
  9. A link from the book chapter is provided.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Either provide details about the image sources and their copyright licenses in the video description or remove the presentation.
  2. This presentation has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement.
  3. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
  4. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

See also[edit source]