Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Vitamin D and emotion regulation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

General comments

[edit source]

Hi Chris,

Really like your topic and how you have set up the page so far. Your key questions seem relevant to your topic but make sure you are incorporating psychological theory as part of answering them i.e. what is it psychologically we need to be well/ motivated/ happy theoretically and how does getting vitamin D support that?

You'll have a fair bit of research to do to answer the questions in that way but it's important to reference it.

all the best, Ari --Ubaldo111 (discusscontribs) 01:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions

[edit source]

I wonder if including information on how to diagnose/know if you are vitamin D deficient might be helpful? Persimmon24 (discusscontribs) 06:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
  2. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  4. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
  5. Definitional headings aren't usually needed (e.g., about vitamin D in general and ER in general). Focus on the question in the sub-title.
  1. Add a scenario or case study in a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  3. Vitamin D doesn't have a purpose per se, but it is useful to human beings
  4. What is emotional regulation? is not a core question for this topic - there are other chapters that cover this
  5. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  3. Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  4. No development
  5. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  6. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  7. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Under developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented, captioned, and cited
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  1. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question
  5. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. OK
  2. Wikistyle references are fine, but they need to be formatted consistently (suggest use APA style principles as much as possible)
  3. Don't cite references behind university logins
  4. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  5. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  6. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  1. See also
    1. Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  2. External links
    1. Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  3. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. The three types of required contributions to be demonstrated with direct link(s) to evidence were making:
    1. direct improvements to other chapters (past or current)
    2. comments on the talk pages of other chapters (past or current)
    3. posts about the unit or project on other platforms such as the UCLearn discussion forum or on X using the #emot24
  2. To add direct links to evidence: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  3. Well done on creating and uploading your own image
  4. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a very good presentation
  1. The opening clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation
  2. Engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. A context for the presentation is established through an example
  4. Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological research
  6. The presentation makes very good use of citations to support claims
  7. The presentation makes very good use of examples
  8. The presentation provides useful practical advice
  9. The presentation provides easy to understand information
  1. The conclusion provides a very good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic
  2. The conclusion provides reasonably good take-home message(s)
  1. The audio is easy to follow
  2. The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is well-paced
  4. Reasonably good intonation
  5. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  6. Audio recording quality was reasonably good
  7. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic
  1. Overall, visual display quality is good/
  2. The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides
  3. The font size is mostly sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. Using a sans-serif typeface would make the text easier to read
  5. Use APA style for citations (e.g., no initials, use et al. for three or more authors)
  6. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  7. The visual communication is supplemented in a reasonably good way by relevant images and/or diagrams
  8. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  9. The visual content is well matched to the target topic
  1. The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent.
  2. A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
  3. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features)
  4. A link from the book chapter is provided
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. Provide clickable links to the image sources and license details (e.g., in the description)
  3. A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply