Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, here are some basics notes that could help you with your wiki page. Basically VIA is a psychological measuring systems that tries to illustrate an individuals key strengths. Once an individuals strengths have been recognized, the system tries to help them improve that/those strength/s as well as understand why those characteristics are their strengths. The idea of the VIA is to improve an individuals psychologically well-being by making an individuals life more desired. Their are six virtues (Wisdom and Knowledge, Courage, Humanity, Justice, Temperance and Transcendence) each with their own minor virtues within them.
Furthermore, it may be worthwhile analyzing the validity and reliability of the theory. You may also want to consider where the theory arose from (Positive Psychology) and why.U3175664 (discuss • contribs) 08:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I can see you have started an outline for this chapter and your topic looks very interesting. I wonder if you could discuss the application of values in treatment for different mental health conditions. I know there is research supporting value work in motivational interviewing which can be applied to all sorts of mental health concerns. It may even be worth looking at the application in a population with low self-esteem and values that have been impacted by their condition e.g. eating disorders, drug and alcohol addiction.
I have included some articles that may assist if you think this is a good suggestion.
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Removing the definitional sub-headings and incorporating the planned content into the general introduction to the section (i.e., before the first sub-heading)
Removing sub-headings from the Conclusion
– could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
Probably the Introduction heading isn't needed - consider incorporating this material into the Overview and/or the What is the VIA framework sections instead.
Comparison with DSM isn't required to address the question but could be an interesting way to address the theory/research about the VIA
Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure
If retaining the comparison with DSM, consider adding a related focus question
Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
There seems to be good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research
Excellent emphasis on examples/applications
Note to use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year) and alphabetical ordering of multiple citations
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.
Latest comment: 2 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. # The Overview, Conclusion, use of learning features, and social contributions could be improved.
The title and sub-title were incorrect (fixed)
Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Over the maximum word count. Content beyond 4,000 words has been ignored for marking purposes.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
Avoid one sentence paragraphs. Communicate one idea per paragraph using three to five sentences.
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Layout
Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics, bold, and/or change in font size)
No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
No use of figure(s)
No use of table(s)
No use of feature box(es)
Reasonably good use of scenarios, case studies, or examples
Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Also include links to related book chapters
Add more links
Not counted for marking purposes due to being over the maximum word count
No use of external links in the "External links" section