Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.
Latest comment: 11 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
A promising range of ideas are presented but it is far from clear how this material is derived from a first person reading of the best peer-reviewed psychological theory and research about this topic
Builds reasonably well on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles
Promising depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
Use tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information
Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Insufficient use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
Overall, the quality of written expression is OK but there are several aspects which are below professional standard
Avoid one sentence paragraphs. Communicate one idea per paragraph using three to five sentences.
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used ... as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, communicate concepts in your own words
Figures
Briefly captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text
Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example
Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
Refer to each Figure using APA style
Citations use poor APA style (7th ed.)
References use poor APA style:
Very weak use of the best peer-reviewed psychological theory and research about this topic
Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Move links to non-peer-reviewed sources to the External links section
Basic use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Basic use of feature box(es)
No use of case studies or examples
No use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Overall, this is an improved version, but is still insufficient mainly because it is over the maximum word count and lacks integration and relevant research
Latest comment: 12 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An opening slide with the correct title and incorrect sub-title is displayed. Also narrate or paraphrase the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest (e.g., by introducing a case study or scenario)
A context for the presentation is established
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
The presentation addresses the topic
There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research
The presentation makes no use of citations to support claims
The presentation makes no use of examples
The presentation provides practical advice
The presentation provides easy to understand information
The video title does not match the chapter title and sub-title — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and be more consistent
Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers decide whether or not to watch