Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Productivity and routines

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestions

[edit source]

@U3236610 Allana: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback and Suggestions

[edit source]

Hi Allana, I thoroughly enjoyed your book chapter so far! I really like the case scenario, it really draws the reader in. I like all of your key points, you cover some interesting psychological theories. I found this peer reviewed from 2019 that I think may be helpful toward your book chapter. The article covers the Importance of creating habits and routine.

Good luck Allana! :) Alyssia Myers (discusscontribs) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Allana, this page looks amazing so far! I have one suggestion, it could be worth adding a figure/image for Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, there should be an image available that he made :), such as this one !!! Good luck Gabriel Geld (discusscontribs) 08:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing

Hi U3236610 Allana. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

~~~~


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Under-developed heading structure – develop further
  3. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  4. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  5. The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
  6. Remove general headings such as "Key points"
  7. Headings are theory-heavy; take a broader perspective to the problem
  1. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
  2. Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic. Move detail into subsequent sections.
  3. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  5. Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year)
  6. Move links to articles into the References section. Link using the dois.
  7. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Excellent use of quiz question(s)
  4. Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question
  5. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Good
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. use dois where available instead of other links
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    3. Use alphabetical order
  1. Used effectively
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Link(s) provided to professional profile(s) not accessible even after logging in
  4. Consider linking to your eportfolio page instead
  5. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with indirect link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making:
  2. One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making:
    1. direct improvements to other chapters (past or current)
  3. To add direct links to evidence: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  4. Use a numbered list

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply