Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Reads likely poorly developed and unacknowledged genAI content. If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
Conclusion (the most important section):
Hasn't been developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, the quality of written expression is reasonably good
Layout
Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics and/or bold)
Spelling
Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.
Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour)
Proofreading
More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard
Figures
Figures are very well captioned
Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1)
Increase image sizes so they are easier to read
Tables
Table captions use APA style or wiki style
Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1)
Citations use basic APA style (7th ed.).
Some citations consist of an embedded hyperlink rather than APA style citation and listing in references
List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname
Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
Basic use of image(s)
Very good use of table(s)
Excellent use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of case studies or examples
Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Latest comment: 16 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The presentation could be improved by displaying and narrating a slide with the same title and sub-title as the book chapter to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation
The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
A basic context for the presentation is established
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
The narration could benefit from further scripting and/or practice
Audio recording quality was poor
Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone.
The narrated content is well reasonably well matched to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic
The video title does not match the chapter title and sub-title — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and be more consistent
Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers decide whether or not to watch