Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Generativity

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heading casing

Hi Rocxie. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

~~~~


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed)
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Messy heading structure – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  3. Reads likely poorly developed and unacknowledged genAI content which would violate academic integrity
  4. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  1. No scenario
  2. Reads likely poorly developed and unacknowledged genAI content which would violate academic integrity
  3. No focus questions
  1. Reads likely poorly developed and unacknowledged genAI content. If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  2. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  3. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. Uploaded figures violated copyright
  2. It seems likely that Tutorial 02 hasn't been completed
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. OK
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Only cite sources which have you have accessed and read
  4. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. remove numbering
    2. add hanging indent
    3. alphabetical order
    4. include hyperlinked dois
  5. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  1. See also
    1. OK
    2. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    3. Use sentence casing
    4. Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters)
    5. Use alphabetical order
  2. External links
    1. OK
    2. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    3. Use sentence casing
    4. Include source in brackets after link
  1. Not developed – see Tutorial 02
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply