Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Fogg behaviour model

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestions

[edit source]

@HannahMooney: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:13, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Promising 3-level heading structure
  3. Could benefit from either simplification (e.g., to 2-levels) or rebalancing (e.g., one section has lots of sub-headings, other sections have no sub-headings)
  4. The headings about social media / technology are a little confusing because this is part of the core topic, although these could provide useful examples/scenarios
  5. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
  1. Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
  2. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
  3. Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem. Move detail into subsequent sections.
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  3. Provide the big picture (e.g., in basic terms, what is the model?). The current notes about to be detail without context.
  4. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  5. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  6. Use APA style 7th edition for citations
  7. I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression because there are grammatical and spelling errors
  8. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question
  5. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. OK
  2. All references need to be cited in the text
  3. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  4. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. doi formatting
    4. include hyperlinked dois
    5. use dois where available instead of other links
  1. See also
    1. OK
    2. Identify more relevant Wikiversity links (past book chapters)
    3. Use sentence casing
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Use sentence casing
  1. Good
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  5. At least three different types of contributions
  6. Second link doesn't go to direct comparison/evidence. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  1. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)

No comment

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply