Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@U3170318 and Jtneill: I've been on Wikiversity many years but have only recently become active with cleanup (i.e. deleting). Somebody put this up for speedy delete, and this is the first time I encountered such a request on project like this. Please advise.
The quickest way to "advise" is to remove the {{hangon}} template and say (or do) no more.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Add a scenario in a feature box at the start to help catch reader interest. Consider adding an image to the case study to further help attract reader interest.
A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned
May be overly detailed/ambitious - keep it brief
Expand focus questions; focus on unpacking KE and motivation
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed. Also narrate the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest
Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
Audio communication is well paced
Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
The narration is well practiced and/or performed
Audio recording quality was excellent
The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content)
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A written description of the presentation is provided
Links to and from the book chapter are provided
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, the quality of written expression is reasonably good but there are several aspects which could be improved towards a professional standard
Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences.
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
Spelling
Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.
Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
Citations use correct APA style
References use basic APA style:
Check and correct use of italicisation
Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of image(s)
Image captions should use APA style
No use of table(s)
Very basic use of feature box(es)
Reasonably good use of case studies or examples
Reasonably good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than as a set of questions at the end