Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Self-esteem and culture

Comments

Hey I just wanted to suggest you look at contrasting cultures like america and islam and the self esteem presented by individuals. Very interesting chapter and looking forward to reading it. All the best Iga.leszczynska (discuss • contribs) 02:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Resources

Hi

These resources might be useful

Hamamura, T., & Septarini, B. G. (2017). Culture and Self-Esteem Over Time: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis Among Australians, 1978–2014. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 8(8), 904–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617698205

Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous Administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 Nations: Exploring the Universal and Culture-Specific Features of Global Self-Esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623

Bleidorn, W., Arslan, R. C., Denissen, J. J. A., Rentfrow, P. J., Gebauer, J. E., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Age and Gender Differences in Self-Esteem-A Cross-Cultural Window. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(3), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000078

U3216256 (discuss • contribs) 05:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Very good Description about self provided – consider expanding Link(s) provided to professional profile(s), but access not permitted? Link provided to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions. Headings Basic, mostly 2-level heading structure – would benefit from further development Remove or significantly reduce the general self-esteem content. Instead, provide a brief summary and provide an embedded link the chapter about self-esteem so that the current chapter can focus on the relationship between culture and self-esteem. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Use bullet points (see Tutorial 02) For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Overview - Consider: adding a brief, evocative description of the problem developing the focus questions to focus more specifically on the relationship between culture and self-esteem an image an example or case study Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. The use of general motivational theories is unnecessary. Focus instead on psychological theory that helps to explain the relationships between culture and self-esteem. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): Underway Can be improved by focusing more on the relationship between culture and self-esteem In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions? I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression because there are a lot of grammatical errors. Figure A figure is presented Cite each figure at least once in the main text References OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: alphabetical order capitalisation italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Not developed External links Excellent Not developed

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:58, 4 October 202

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good chapter Chapter title and sub-title was missing (now added) For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Basic Overview Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest Promising focus question(s) Theory – Breadth Relevant theories are well selected and reasonably well described and explained The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory Build more strongly on other self-related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Self) Theory – Depth Insightful depth is provided about the selected theory(ies) Key citations are well used Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts More examples could be useful to illustrate key concepts Research – Key findings Reasonably good review of relevant research It could help to say more about the extent to which self-esteem is related to other indicators of psychology well-being and performance. More detail about key studies would be ideal Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated Conclusion Basic summary The practical, take-home message(s) are excellent Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is below professional standard. UC Study Skills assistance is recommended to help improve writing skills Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Layout Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar The grammar for many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Figures Figures are very well captioned Figure captions use the correct format Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Tables Table captions should use APA style. See example Refer to each Table using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: Multiple citations in parentheses should be listed in alphabetical order by first author surname References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of italicisation Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Include hyperlinked dois Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is very good Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. Basic use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Excellent use of image(s) Good use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Good use of quiz(zes) Very good use of case studies or examples Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Links to more relevant chapters could be used. Basic use of external links in the "External links" sections Social contribution ~7 logged, useful, minor/moderate/major social contributions with direct links to evidence Thanks very much for your extensive contributions ~3 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess Use a numbered list per Tutorial 02

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)2 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest Establish a context for the topic (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic in a basic way An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation is has a basic structure (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research Include citations to support claims The presentation makes little to no use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with basic take-home message(s) The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit Audio The presentation makes basic use of audio Audio communication is well paced Consider using greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement The narration is well practiced Audio recording quality was OK. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. Video Overall, visual display quality is basic Visual resolution is low (i.e., fuzzy)? The presentation makes basic use of animated slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams Surprisingly little culture diversity is evident in the selected imagery The presentation is basically produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. A broken link to the book chapter is provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)