Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Mixed emotions

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title and sub-title were almost correctly worded and formatted. Now fixed. User page Created – minimal, but sufficient Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions. Headings Basic heading structure – would benefit from further development The second level of heading is very generic; customise Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.) Key points Insufficient development. There is almost no planned content. Overview and Conclusion (the most important sections) haven't been developed The focus questions need refinement to be more specific to psychological science about this topic Figure A relevant figure is presented Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Consider decreasing image sizes Cite each figure at least once in the main text References None Resources See also Excellent External links Can be improved Target an international audience See Tutorial 02 for how to present external links Include source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Sources

Hi there,

This looks like a super interesting topic ! I look forward to reading it once its complete. I found some sources that might help you out including basic information regarding mixed emotions, happy versus sad mixed emotions and a meta analysis comparing models of mixed emotions ! I hope this helps:

https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/spc3.12108?casa_token=EGYe84PTSu4AAAAA:R7MTuHM2MNO3gyqex67-hlxCkVx8ZXemeFGvdNb9MeSGqVpBOz5HI1eJh7alpn7stIsKp7YNsnVTYQJK-A

https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/28/4/636/1785527

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00428/full

Good luck ! U3210431 (discuss • contribs) 11:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation Overview An opening slide with the title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Also include sub-title This presentation has an engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the topic is established Focus questions are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic Check and correct grammar (e.g., your vs you're) An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research Include citations to academic peer-review sources The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with clear take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is clear and well paced Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well polished Audio recording quality was excellent Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The presentation is basically produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A good description of the presentation is provided A link to the book chapter is provided but it goes to a specific section rather than the top of the chapter and the link is not clickable A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Probably the images are all from PowToon but this is not explicitly stated. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a promising but ultimately basic chapter Well over the maximum word count. The content beyond 4000 words has been ignored for marking purposes (i.e., from Conclusion onwards ignored). The second main area for potential improvement would to be move all non-peer reviewed links into the external links section and replace with citations to the best available academic, peer-reviewed theory and research sources about mixed emotions The third main area for potential improvement is to get assistance with correcting grammar and proofreading to bring the quality of written expression up to a professional standard. The four main area for potential improvement is to reduce the general focus on emotion and narrow the focus on mixed emotions For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Reasonably good Overview Explains the problem or phenomenon Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or example and/or using an image Rewrite focus questions using 3rd person perspective Theory – Breadth A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained There is too much general theoretical material (e.g., descriptions of individual emotions based on non-academic sources). Instead, summarise and link to further information (such as other book chapters or Wikipedia articles), to allow this chapter to focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question). Overly focused on definitions; summarise and move to the more substantive aspects of theory Build more strongly on other emotion-related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Emotion) Theory – Depth Good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Reduce emphasis on general emotion theory; increase emphasis on mixed emotion theory Effective use of tables and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Research – Key findings Basic review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations Research – Critical thinking Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Basic integration between theory and research Conclusion Not reviewed (over max. word count) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is basic. UC Study Skills assistance is recommended to help improve writing skills Internationalise: Write for an international, rather than domestic, audience. Australians make up only 0.32% of the world human population. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. Layout See earlier comments about heading casing Remove colons at the end of headings Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.[2] Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Check and make correct use of commas Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[3] Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Write numbers under 10 using words (e.g., five). Write numbers 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 10). Figures Figures are very well captioned Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text Figure captions use the correct format Use this format for figure captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Tables Use APA style for captions. See example Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: Check and correct use of full-stops and commas for citations involving three or more authors Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses For direct quotes, a space is need between p. and the number (e.g., p. 77) References are not in full APA style. For example: Replace colon before page numbers with a comma Check and correct use of capitalisation[4] Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Written expression – Learning features Very good use of learning features One use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Move links to non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Excellent use of image(s) Excellent use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of quiz(zes) Excellent use of case studies or examples Use of links in the "See also" and "External links" sections are not counted for marking purposes (over word count) Social contribution No logged social contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)