Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Heart rate variability and emotion regulation

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:14, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Good Description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter (rename to make it more user-friendly) Social contribution None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions. Headings Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings Key points Basic development of key points for some sections, with relevant citations Limited theory and research knowledge about the relationship between HRV and ER demonstrated Overview - Consider adding: a brief, evocative description of the problem focus questions an image an example or case study Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): Under developed Figure Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text References OK Move non-peer-reviewed sources to External links For APA referencing style, check and correct: doi formatting - make links active page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also OK Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02) Include source in brackets after link Not developed External links OK Use sentence casing Include source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:14, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hey there!

I found a source that might be beneficial for you. It looks at heart rate variability and emotion regulation amongst individuals struggling with obesity and a loss of control eating. This sources describes how heart rate variability may mark changes in emotion regulation consequently affecting eating habit. How intriguing !! I hope you find this helpful:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938418305420?casa_token=81OkM-UDzd4AAAAA:AvIKgI-CsCh8yxnow3Tu0ClxiV7A2T-ut4pKAwaJRJEBaCjgUHloM2cLQipE5Z8vDF2DIR5jHkRY

Good luck :) U3210431 (discuss • contribs) 11:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hello! This is a really interesting topic and something that could you with your chapter is discussing the concept of interocption and its ability to help regulate emotions if the person is aware of their bodily states. Could be interesting to touch on. I have found an article that discusses this further. I have also found an article on how heart rate affects emotion regulation in the brain which could also be helpful in completing your chapter. Hope this helps! 1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5985305/ 2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5761738/ U3216389 (discuss • contribs) 00:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient presentation mainly because it fails to adequately address the topic More specifically, the presentation (including Audio and Video) doesn’t demonstrate an adequate understanding of: HRV the relationship between HRV and emotion regulation how HRV biofeedback can be used to develop higher HRV no research cited. Overview An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter. Consider creating an engaging introduction to hook audience interest Establish a context for the topic (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content This presentation doesn't adequately address the topic Explain what HRV is and its relationship with emotion regulation Include citations to support claims The presentation is poorly structured (e.g., lacks Overview and Conclusion and insufficient structuring of content to adequately address the topic) The selection of content is poor because it doesn't adequately use the most relevant psychological theory and/or research to address the topic The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Consider using greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement The narrated content isn't well matched to the target topic (see content) Video Overall, visual display quality is very basic The presentation makes very basic use of text and image based slides The visual content is poorly matched to the target topic (see content) The amount of text presented per slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The presentation is basically produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated Ideally, provide clickable links to the original image sources (e.g., in the description) A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient chapter mainly because: The chapter focuses too much on ER in general, rather than ER in relation to HRV The explanation of HRV is inadequate There is insufficient review of, and integration of, research No examples are provided I suspect that the recommended 5 topic development hours and 45 book chapter hours were not invested in preparing this chapter. Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Basic Overview Briefly explain HRV, and why it might be linked to ER, to an unfamiliar audience Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest Basic focus question(s) Use open-ended questions No need for general questions; focus directly on the topic (HRV & ER) Theory – Breadth Insufficient use of relevant psychological theory about this topic Poor explanation of HRV and its relationship to ER. Try explaining it a 6-year old. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Theory – Depth Insufficient use of relevant psychological theory Tables and/or lists could be used more effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information More examples could be useful to illustrate key concepts Research – Key findings Insufficient use of relevant psychological research Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags) Integration Insufficient integration of relevant theory and research Conclusion Insufficient as a cohesive summary of what the best available psychological theory and research has to say about the topic Address the focus questions Clear take-home message(s) Add practical, take-home message(s) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is below professional standard. UC Study Skills assistance is recommended to help improve writing skills Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. Use permanent, rather than relative, time references. For example, instead of "20 years ago", refer to something like "at the beginning of the 21st century". In this way, the text will survive better into the future, without needing to be rewritten. See earlier comments about heading casing Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Use serial commas[2] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min) Check and make correct use of commas Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Figures Figures are very well captioned Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of italicisation Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Include hyperlinked dois "Retrieved from" is no longer used (APA style, 7th ed.) Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is basic No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. Excellent/Very good/Good/Basic/One/No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Citations and links to non-peer-reviewed sources should be moved to the external links section Good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Basic use of quiz(zes). Focus the questions on the relationship between HRV and ER. Basic use of case studies or examples Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Rename links per Tutorial 02 Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Use sentence casing Social contribution No logged social contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)