Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Core emotions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Suggestions for this chapter

[edit source]

Hi! Exploring the Facial Feedback Hypothesis by Paul Ekman could be useful in defining universally felt core emotions. I have found a good article that helps explore this hypothesis but also test the hypothesis itself so there is some good evidence there that could be used to support the theory. The textbook is also quite helpful in regards to this concept. Hope this helps! https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816132/ U3216389 (discusscontribs) 02:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Did you know: Of all types of emotions, the briefest core emotion is surprise. Depending on the stimuli, surprise quickly disappears to anger, fear, happiness, or disgust." Source? - U3216502


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

  1. The title is correctly worded
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
  3. The capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents.
  1. Used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  5. Chapter content moved to target book chapter page
  1. At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
  2. Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  3. Add a brief summary of each contribution
  4. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)
  1. Basic, 3-level heading structure – could benefit from:
    1. simplification to a 2-level structure
    2. expanding the sub-headings in sections which don't have sub-headings

further development by expanding the structure

  1. Remove colons from headings which don't have any following text
  1. Basic development of key points for some sections, with relevant citations
  2. Note that "6" is arbitrary. Acknowledge that there are multiple models and that there are other candidates e.g., interest, contempt. Having said that, it is very reasonable and necessary for this chapter to select, say, half a dozen, and concentrate on those.
  3. There is a lack of sufficient citation
  4. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. focus questions
    2. an image
    3. an example or case study
  5. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
  6. I suggest thinking of this chapter as a high-level gateway entry to the chapters about specific emotions. So, critical for this chapter is to include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant book chapters and/or relevant Wikipedia articles.
  7. Consider including more examples/case studies
  8. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
  1. A relevant figure is not presented and cited
  1. Poor
  2. Use APA style
  1. See also
    1. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Not developed

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:51, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reference suggestion - book on emotion

[edit source]

Hi, I found the following book useful. Hope it helps- Barrett, L., Winkielman, P., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2005). Emotion and consciousness. Guilford Publications.--Alec.cortez (discusscontribs) 23:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

[edit source]

Hi,

I have insert very interesting footage that I found when watching children emotions. I hope it will help with improvement of your book chapter. see link below https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPaPOUvejWQ

Ajeofula22 (discusscontribs) 06:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback

[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is an insufficient chapter. I suspect that the recommended 5 topic development hours and 45 book chapter hours were not invested in preparing this chapter.
  2. Insufficient use of primary, peer-reviewed sources as citations
  3. Move non-peer reviewed links into the external links section
  4. Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand
  5. Ideally, this would be a gateway chapter rich with embedded links to more specific chapters about different emotions etc.
  6. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
  1. Basic Overview
  2. Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon
  3. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest
  4. Clear focus question(s)
  1. Good coverage of relevant theory is provided
  2. I suggest distinguishing between happiness and joy
  3. There is a lack of sufficient citation of academic sources
  1. Basic depth is provided about the selected theory(ies)
  2. There is a lack of sufficient citation of academic sources
  3. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  4. Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts
  1. Insufficient use of relevant psychological research
  1. Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  2. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. discussing the direction of relationships
    3. considering the strength of relationships
    4. acknowledging limitations
    5. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
    6. suggesting specific directions for future research
  3. Most claims are unreferenced
  1. Insufficient integration of relevant theory and research
  1. Basic summary
  2. Clear take-home message(s)
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is below professional standard. UC Study Skills assistance is recommended to help improve writing skills
    2. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences
    3. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes.
  2. Layout
    1. Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections
  3. Grammar
    1. The grammar for many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance.
    2. Abbreviations
      1. Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses
  4. Spelling
    1. Spelling can be improved (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.
    2. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour)
  5. Proofreading
    1. More proofreading is needed to fix typos and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard (e.g., missing and misplaced periods).
    2. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
      2. Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example
      3. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
      4. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation)
    3. Tables
      1. Table captions should use APA style. See example
      2. Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text
    4. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Only included references which are cited
      2. Check and correct use of capitalisation[2]
      3. Check and correct use of italicisation
      4. Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
      5. Include hyperlinked dois
      6. Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section
  1. Overall, the use of learning features is basic
  2. No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Use in-text interwiki links, rather than external links, per Tutorial 2
  5. Links to non-peer-reviewed sources should be moved to the external links section
  6. Good use of image(s)
  7. Good use of table(s)
  8. Very good use of feature box(es)
  9. Good use of quiz(zes)
  10. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  11. Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  12. Basic use of external links in the "External links" section
  13. Include sources in parentheses
  14. Format bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 02
  1. ~4 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a basic presentation
  2. The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes
  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Also narrate the title and sub-title.
  2. Consider creating an engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. Briefly explain why this topic is important
  4. Focus questions are briefly presented
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. There is too much content because the Conclusion runs out of time
  4. The presentation uses a basic structure
  5. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory
  6. The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research
  7. Include citations to support claims
  8. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
  1. The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit
  2. The Conclusion could be improved by also summarising the take-home messages in text
  1. The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio
  2. Basic intonation
  3. The presentation lacks polish that could come with more practice
  4. Audio recording quality was basic.
  1. The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides
  2. The quality of images is basic. The display of some images could be improved (e.g., use higher resolution images for the core emotion emoticons)
  3. Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read
  4. The amount of text presented on most slides makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  5. The amount of text presented on the "What are core emotions" slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time
  6. The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams
  7. The presentation is basically produced using simple tools
  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided.
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter resubmission feedback

[edit source]
  1. Approximately 900 words have been added. See my copyedits.
    1. Some of the introduced material is barely relevant (e.g., Joesph Jastrow)
    2. An introduction to the six core emotions section has been added
    3. The description of Plutchik's wheel of emotion has been expanded
    4. The conclusion has been expanded
    5. Some grammatical errors have been fixed; others have been introduced
  2. Written style / grammar
    1. Remove colons from the end of headings
    2. Use 3rd person perspective (instead of 1st person perspective)
    3. Remove overcapitalisation (e.g,. Core Emotions -> core emotions); fix undercapitalisation (e.g., i -> I; polish -> Polish)
    4. Use double rather than single quotation marks (e.g., 'basic' -> "basic")
    5. Limited to no use of contemporary research about this topic
  3. Social contributions
    1. 2 post-semester tweets with links to info
    2. 3 photos unrelated to motivation and emotion uploaded to Wikimedia Commons

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply