Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Learned optimism

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tutorial 06: Learned optimism
This is the sixth tutorial for the motivation and emotion unit of study.

Overview[edit | edit source]

This tutorial:

  1. Explores learned optimism (the opposite of learned helplessness)
  2. Wraps up motivation - following tutorials focus mainly on emotion

Learned optimism[edit | edit source]

Figure 1. Shuttle box used by Seligman to experiment with learned helplessness in dogs.

This exercise explores learned optimism.

Learned optimism relates to personal control beliefs in Chapter 10 of Reeve (2018) and the mindsets, control, and the self lecture. Whilst the textbook and lecture focus on learned helplessness, here attention is turned to the opposite: learned optimism.

Define and discuss:

  • What characterises learned helplessness?
  • What characterises learned optimism?

A computer metaphor:

  • Body and brain = "hardware". Can't easily be changed
  • Thinking = "software". Reprogrammable
  • This is the view, at least, of cognitive psychology

Martin Seligman[edit | edit source]

The learned helplessness and learned optimism concepts were developed by Martin Seligman. Seligman started with research about learned helplessness in animals and then later applied this to learning optimism in humans and positive psychology more generally. Three key books in this respect are:

  • Helplessness: On depression, development, and death (Seligman, 1975)
  • Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life (Seligman, 1990)
  • The hope circuit: A psychologist's journey from helplessness to optimism (Seligman, 2018)

Learned Optimism Test[edit | edit source]

  1. Complete the Learned Optimism Test (48 items; 10 - 15 mins; modified from Seligman, 1991)
  2. Scoring: "Right" answers are scored as optimistic; "wrong" answers are scored as pessimistic
  3. Keep your answers up on the screen; note the total
  4. Explain the theoretical structure - see dimensions
  5. View and discuss the results.

The Learned Optimism Test is structured around six dimensions, based on three types of attributions about two types of events:

  • Permanence (Good and Bad)
  • Pervasiveness (Good and Bad)
  • Personalisation (Good and Bad)

Table 1.

Attributional Dimensions of Pessimism and Optimism

Attribution Bad Good
Permanence PmB PmG
Pervasiveness PvB PvG
Personalisation PsB PsG
Total ToB ToG

Table 2.

Explanatory Styles Based on Attributional Dimensions of Pessimism and Optimism

Optimistic Pessimistic
Good event Permanent






Bad event Temporary






Permanence[edit | edit source]

Time: Temporary vs. Permanent - a pessimistic view is that bad events are permanent and good events are temporary (opposite for optimism)

  • PmB (Permanent Bad)
  • PmG (Permanent Good)

Pervasiveness[edit | edit source]

Space: Specific vs. Universal - across situations/domains: a pessimistic view is that bad events are pervasive across situations/domains and good events are specific to a situation/domain (opposite for optimism)

  • PvB (Pervasive Bad)
  • PvG (Pervasive Good)

Personalisation[edit | edit source]

Control/causality: Internal vs. External: e.g., a pessimistic view is that bad events are internally caused and good events are externally causes (opposite for optimism)

  • PsB (Personalisation Bad)
  • PsG (Personalisation Good)

Totals[edit | edit source]

Assuming optimistic responses are scored positively.

  • Hope (HoB) = PvB + PmB (i.e., Hope for Bad Events).
  • Seligman indicates that this is the single most important score.
Total Bad
  • Total B (Bad) = PmB + PvB + PsB
Total Good
  • Total G (Good) = PmG + PvG + PsG
  • Overall Optimism = Total G + Total B

ABCDE solution[edit | edit source]

Would you like to become more optimistic?

If so, Seligman suggests a cognitive ABCDE solution:

Table 3.

How to Change Pessimistic Thinking Styles

A Adversity When we encounter adversity, we react by thinking about it
B Beliefs Our thoughts rapidly congeal into beliefs
C Consequences These beliefs ... have consequences
D Disputation Challenge problematic beliefs by finding evidence against them, alternatives to negative reasoning, and limit the implications of the beliefs. "Much of the skill of dealing with setbacks ... consists of learning how to dispute your own first thoughts in reaction to a setback." (Seligman)
E Energisation We feel energised after we've disputed our false, negative beliefs

Is optimism always good?[edit | edit source]

There are well established positive relationships between optimism and important life outcomes such as physical health (e.g., longevity) and psychological well-being.

But is optimism always good? For example:

  • Narcissism - Believing that one is all-powerful and influential can contribute to inflated self-importance (i.e., narcissism)
  • Risk-taking - Believing that one can control good outcomes (when you actually can't) can be problematic (e.g., gambling)

Despite these potential problems, the advantages of optimism are overwhelming. So much so that the psychologically healthiest people tend to have "positive illusions", that is, they have somewhat unrealistically positive views. "Realists", on the other hand, are more prone to depression.

References[edit | edit source]

Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. Vintage Books.

Seligman, M. E. (2018). The hope circuit: A psychologist's journey from helplessness to optimism. Penguin Random House Australia.

Recording[edit | edit source]

See also[edit | edit source]

Additi|onal tutorial material
Book chapters

External links[edit | edit source]