Magnetic field reversals/Earth
The magnetic field of the Earth is known to undergo magnetic field reversals.
The observed magnetic profile for the seafloor across the East Pacific Rise tends to agree with a profile calculated from the Earth's known magnetic reversals.
Cooled crustal rock moving outward from the Mid-Atlantic ridge retains a record of the Earth's magnetic field.
Theoretical magnetic field reversals
[edit | edit source]On the right is an image of a model for the formation of magnetic striping on Earth.
Here's a theoretical definition:
Def. a polarity reversal of the global magnetic field of an astronomical object or body is called a magnetic field reversal.
Secular rotational stability
[edit | edit source]Secular "rotational stability [may be] in response to loading using the fluid limit of viscoelastic Love number theory. [...] an uncompensated surface mass load [...] of any size would drive true [rotational] polar wander (TPW) that ultimately reorients the load to the equator."[1] The "equilibrium pole position is a function of the lithospheric strength, [with] significantly larger predicted TPW for planets with thin lithospheres. [...] nonaxisymmetric surface mass loads and internal (convective) heterogeneity, even when these are small relative to axisymmetric contributions, can profoundly influence the rotational stability. Indeed, [...] nonaxisymmetric forcing initiates an inertial interchange TPW event (i.e., a 90° pole shift)."[1] A two-step process, depending on the mass loading could place the rotational pole from one end, to the equator, then to the other end.
"Stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs) are extreme events in the polar stratosphere that are both caused by and have effects on the tropospheric flow. This means that SSWs are associated with changes in the angular momentum of the atmosphere, both before and after their onset. Because these angular momentum changes are transferred to the solid Earth, they can be observed in the rate of the Earth's rotation and the wobble of its rotational pole."[2] An "anomaly in the orientation of the Earth's rotational pole, up to 4 times as large as the annual polar wobble, typically precedes SSWs by 20-40 days. The polar motion signal is due to pressure anomalies that are typically seen before SSW events and represents a new type of observable that may aid in the prediction of SSWs. A decline in the length of day is also seen, on average, near the time of the SSW wind reversal and is found to be due to anomalous easterly winds generated in the tropical troposphere around this time, though the structure and timing of this signal seems to vary widely from event to event."[2]
There are "two new finite rotation poles from visual-fitting, for chron C33 in the Bellingshausen Sea sector."[3]
"The pattern of focal mechanisms and plate motion studies suggest that [the CAPricorn and AUStralian diffuse plate boundary] is made of two disjoint zones, on either side of the CAP/AUS rotation pole."[4]
Geomagnetic polarity
[edit | edit source]Any "field reversal [may be] linked to biological extinction7–12 [...] the reversal record of the past 165 Myr [shows that a] stationary periodicity of 30 Myr emerges (superimposed on the non-stationarities already established by others5), which predicts pulses of increased reversal activity centred at 10, 40, 70,… Myr BP."[5]
A "recently observed 15 Myr periodicity is probably a harmonic of the 29.5-30.5 Myr period. The calculations do not confirm an inherent magnetic reversal property of the earth. The reversals may arise from tectonic events or from impacts from extraterrestrial objects."[6]
"The precession peaks found in the δ18O record from core MD900963 are in excellent agreement with climatic oscillations predicted by the astronomical theory of climate."[7]
"The Earth's geomagnetic field reverses its polarity at irregular time intervals. [It] is not clear whether a reversal is a deterministic (low dimensional) or a random (high-dimensional) process; the duration-frequency distribution of the polarity time intervals resembles those generated by random processes, but many models suggest that a geomagnetic field reversal can be the outcome of a deterministic dynamics, that of the convection in the Earth's outer core. [The] limited size of the magnetic reversal data (282 points) and the poor convergence of the correlation integrals make a quantitative assessment of low-dimensional chaos impossible."[8]
"Earth's magnetic field is generated by fluid motion in the liquid iron core. Details of how this occurs are now emerging from numerical simulations that achieve a self-sustaining magnetic field. Early results predict a dominant dipole field outside the core, and some models even reproduce magnetic reversals."[9]
"Regeneration of the Earth's magnetic field by convection in the liquid core produces a broad spectrum of time variation. [...] the amplitude of convective fluctuations in the core [is predictable], and establish a physical connection to the rates of magnetic reversals and excursions."[10]
The graph in the center shows a comparison of the observed magnetic profile for the seafloor across the East Pacific Rise against a profile calculated from the Earth's known magnetic reversals, assuming a constant rate of spreading.
Heinrich Layers
[edit | edit source]"Heinrich Layers [HLs] are found in the North Atlantic Ocean as well-constrained markers of catastrophic iceberg surges from the Pan-Atlantic ice sheets during the last glacial cycle. Their physical and geochemical characteristics [...] are predominantly due to the source sediments of the ice-rafted debris (IRD) on the one hand (magnetic susceptibility, color, carbonate content) and the response of the palaeo-environment on the other hand (carbonate content, foraminiferal assemblage)."[11]
"Sediment cores in the Porcupine Seabight (West off Ireland) have shown the presence of Heinrich Events [Hs] without the diagnostic changes in magnetic susceptibility (MS) [...] the concentration of ice-rafted debris (commonly referred to as the fraction > 150 μm) increases towards the culmination of HL2, marked by an increase in MS, [X-ray fluorescence] XRF Ca and the percentage of N. pachyderma s."[11]
The "zone where the density increases is marked by a cloud of fine and highly dense particles surrounding the IRD. [The] fine clayey “background” matrix throughout the core [consists] of zoned dolomites. [...] the mineralogical analyses [suggest] a predominant volcanic source for the magnetic susceptibility. [Both] XRF Fe and Ti show significant decreases near the HL culmination".[11]
Chronology of climatic events on the upper right of importance for the Last Glacial Period (~last 120,000 years) is recorded in polar ice cores, and approximate relative position of Heinrich events, initially recorded in marine sediment cores from the North Atlantic Ocean. Light violet line: δ18O from the NGRIP ice core (Greenland), permil (NGRIP members, 2004). Orange dots: temperature reconstruction for the NGRIP drilling site (Kindler et al., 2014). Dark violet line: δ18O from the EDML ice core (Antarctica), permil (EPICA community members, 2006). Grey areas: major Heinrich events of mostly Laurentide origine (H1, H2, H4, H5). Grey hatch: major Heinrich events of mostly European origine (H3, H6). Light grey hatch and numbers C-14 to C-25: minor IRD layers registered in North Atlantic marine sediment cores (Chapman et al., 1999). HS-1 to HS-10: Heinrich Stadial (HS, Heinrich, 1988; Rasmussen et al., 2003; Rashid et al., 2003). GS-2 to GS-24: Greenland Stadial (GS, Rasmussen et al., 2014). AIM-1 to AIM-24: Antarctic Isotope Maximum (AIM, EPICA community members, 2006). Antarctica and Greenland ice core records are shown on their common timescale AICC2012 (Bazin et al., 2013; Veres et al., 2013).
The image second down on the right suggests that lithic proportion of sediments deposited during H3 and H6 is substantially below that of other Heinrich events.
The image on the left shows the ratio of calcium versus strontium in a North Atlantic drill core (blue; Hodell et al., 2008) compared to petrologic counts of "detrital carbonate" (Bond et al., 1999; Obrochta et al., 2012; Obrochta et al., 2014), the mineralogically-distinctive component of Hudson Strait-derived IRD. Shading indicates glaciations ("ice ages").
Event | Age, Kyr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hemming (2004) | Bond & Lotti (1995) | Vidal et al. (1999) | |
H0 | ~12 | ||
H1 | 16.8 | 14 | |
H2 | 24 | 23 | 22 |
H3 | ~31 | 29 | |
H4 | 38 | 37 | 35 |
H5 | 45 | 45 | |
H6 | ~60 | ||
H1,2 are dated by radiocarbon; H3-6 by correlation to Greenland Ice Sheet Project (GISP2). |
Geomagnetic excursions
[edit | edit source]In the section above the most recent geomagnetic polarity reversal occurred 780,000 b2k.[12]
"Paleomagnetic samples were obtained from cores taken during the drilling of a research well along Coyote Creek in San Jose, California, in order to use the geomagnetic field behavior recorded in those samples to provide age constraints for the sediment encountered. The well reached a depth of 308 meters and material apparently was deposited largely (entirely?) during the Brunhes Normal Polarity Chron, which lasted from 780 ka to the present time."[12]
"Three episodes of anomalous magnetic inclinations were recorded in parts of the sedimentary sequence; the uppermost two we correlate to the Mono Lake (~30 ka) geomagnetic excursion and 6 cm lower, tentatively to the Laschamp (~45 ka) excursion."[12]
"Some 41,000 years ago, a complete and rapid reversal of the geomagnetic field occured. Magnetic studies on sediment cores from the Black Sea show that during this period, during the last ice age, a compass at the Black Sea would have pointed to the south instead of north."[13]
"[A]dditional data from other studies in the North Atlantic, the South Pacific and Hawaii, prove that this polarity reversal was a global event."[13]
"The field geometry of reversed polarity, with field lines pointing into the opposite direction when compared to today's configuration, lasted for only about 440 years, and it was associated with a field strength that was only one quarter of today's field."[13]
"The actual polarity changes lasted only 250 years. In terms of geological time scales, that is very fast."[13]
"During this period, the field was even weaker, with only 5% of today's field strength. As a consequence, Earth nearly completely lost its protection shield against hard cosmic rays, leading to a significantly increased radiation exposure."[13]
"This is documented by peaks of radioactive beryllium (10Be) in ice cores from this time, recovered from the Greenland ice sheet. 10Be as well as radioactive carbon (14C) is caused by the collision of high-energy protons from space with atoms of the atmosphere."[13]
"The polarity reversal [...] has already been known for 45 years. It was first discovered after the analysis of the magnetisation of several lava flows near the village Laschamp near Clermont-Ferrand in the Massif Central, which differed significantly from today's direction of the geomagnetic field. Since then, this geomagnetic feature is known as the 'Laschamp event'."[13]
The "new data from the Black Sea give a complete image of geomagnetic field variability at a high temporal resolution."[13]
Geomagnetic fields
[edit | edit source]"Right now, the magnetic pole, which happens to be close to the geographical North Pole, is shifting some 50 km a year from Canada in the direction of Russia. And the magnetic field has significantly decreased in some places."[14]
"The biggest of these weak spots lies in a large area reaching from South Africa to South America: over the South Atlantic, airline passengers are subjected to radiation 1,000 times higher than on other air routes at flying altitude. At these latitudes, the crew of the International Space Station receives 90 percent of it‘s radiation dosis, despite the fact that it is staying there only about ten minutes every day."[14]
The "floors of thousand years old clay huts in Africa [...] are keeping an imprint of the magnetic field as it was in prior centuries – thanks to a local custom: the inhabitants of the banks of Limpopo-River, at the border of South Africa with Zimbabwe and Botswana, used to ritually burn down their huts when there was a drought."[14]
"The heat of the fire, [reached above 1,000° C], transformed the clay: when the fire died out and the soil cooled down, magnetic minerals contained in the clay shifted position to align themselves with the magnetic field such is as it was reigning at the time. Moreover, the presence of particles with a measurable rate of radioactive decay make it possible to determine accurately the age of these huts."[14]
The record points "to a weak, old magnetic field: between 1000 and 1500 [AD, 1,000 to 500 b2k], the [Earth's] magnetic field had decreased in that area by ca 30 per cent."[15]
The "African discovery is actually good news. It shows that the [Earth‘s] magnetic field undergoes bouts of weakness more often than had been thought, and the present slowing down doesn’t seem to be particularly significant."[15]
The "field recovered temporarily after a weak phase in the Middle-Ages, before it went into a crisis again 180 years ago."[14]
"The clay floors of the African huts reveal this magnetic field weakness of the Middle-Ages thanks to their magnetic particles: they froze into place, still pointing North, yet their angle, called inclination, varies in unusual ways."[14]
"Under South Africa, the South Atlantic and South America, at the edge of the [Earth‘s] core at a depth of some 3,000 kilometers, pictures reveal a zone of low speed – there, the rocks must be made up in a special way. A relation with the weak geomagnetic field comes to mind: probably that the flow of liquid iron which produces the magnetic field is changing it's course at this spot."[15]
"Roughly, the fluctuations of the geomagnetic field can be followed back for millions of years. The Earth’s solidified lava rocks too contain magnetisation. The examination of such rocks shows that the Earth‘ magnetic field reverses its poles on average every few hundreds of thousands of years."[14]
"More than 2,500 years ago in the ancient Near East, the Earth's geomagnetic field was going gangbusters."[16]
"During the late eighth century B.C., a new study finds, the magnetic field that surrounds the planet was temporarily 2.5 times stronger than it is today."[16]
"About 3,000 years ago, a potter near Jerusalem made a big jar. It was meant to hold olive oil or wine or something else valuable enough to send to the king as a tax payment. The jar's handles were stamped with a royal seal, and the pot went into the kiln."[17]
"Over the next 600 years, despite wars destructive enough to raze cities, potters in the area kept making ceramic tax jars, each one stamped with whatever seal represented the ruler du jour."[17]
"Albert Einstein defined this problem as one of the five most enigmatic issues in modern physics, and it still is, because the mechanism that creates the magnetic field is not well understood."[18]
"All those years ago, as potters continued to throw clay, the molten iron that was rotating deep below them tugged at tiny bits of magnetic minerals embedded in the potters' clay. As the jars were heated in the kiln and then subsequently cooled, those minerals swiveled and froze into place like tiny compasses, responding to the direction and strength of the Earth's magnetic field at that very moment."[17]
The "jars indicate that in the late 8th century B.C., the core went a little crazy. The intensity of the magnetic field spiked to about double what it is today."[17]
"It was the strongest it's been, at least in the last 100,000 years, but maybe ever. We call this phenomenon the Iron Age spike."[18]
"Then, it weakened quickly after 732 B.C.E., losing about 30 percent of its intensity in just 30 years."[17]
The "Earth could undergo big changes in magnetic intensity — the poles are thought to reverse about every 200,000 to 300,000 years. But in between those times, people assumed there wasn't much going on."[19]
Geomagnetic reversals
[edit | edit source]- 1985: Any "field reversal [may be] linked to biological extinction7–12 [...] the reversal record of the past 165 Myr [shows that a] stationary periodicity of 30 Myr emerges (superimposed on the non-stationarities already established by others5), which predicts pulses of increased reversal activity centred at 10, 40, 70,… Myr BP."[5] See hypotheses 2 and 3. So what's causing the 30 Myr period?
- 1986: A "recently observed 15 Myr periodicity is probably a harmonic of the 29.5-30.5 Myr period. The calculations do not confirm an inherent magnetic reversal property of the earth. The reversals may arise from tectonic events or from impacts from extraterrestrial objects."[6] Here, can be external events or tectonic events for the origin of reversals.
- 1994: "The precession peaks found in the δ18O record from core MD900963 are in excellent agreement with climatic oscillations predicted by the astronomical theory of climate."[7] In other words, orbital changes have produced or induced magnetic field reversals.
- 1994: "The Earth's geomagnetic field reverses its polarity at irregular time intervals. [It] is not clear whether a reversal is a deterministic (low dimensional) or a random (high-dimensional) process; the duration-frequency distribution of the polarity time intervals resembles those generated by random processes, but many models suggest that a geomagnetic field reversal can be the outcome of a deterministic dynamics, that of the convection in the Earth's outer core. [The] limited size of the magnetic reversal data (282 points) and the poor convergence of the correlation integrals make a quantitative assessment of low-dimensional chaos impossible."[8]
- 2000: "Earth's magnetic field is generated by fluid motion in the liquid iron core. Details of how this occurs are now emerging from numerical simulations that achieve a self-sustaining magnetic field. Early results predict a dominant dipole field outside the core, and some models even reproduce magnetic reversals."[9] Here, the geodynamo is the source of the reversals.
- 2003: The "redistribution of magnetic polarities in the inner heliosphere during [a 10.5-month period of maximum solar activity] can be simply described by a gradual 180 degree rotation of the dipole axis from near-alignment with one solar rotational pole to the other."[20]
- 2013: "Regeneration of the Earth's magnetic field by convection in the liquid core produces a broad spectrum of time variation. [...] the amplitude of convective fluctuations in the core [is predictable], and establish a physical connection to the rates of magnetic reversals and excursions."[10]
Source for the last 83 million years: Cande and Kent, 1995[21]
Ages in million years before present (Ma).
End/Top (Ma) | Beginning/Base (Ma) | Normal polarity | Name |
0.000 | 0.780 | 1n | Brunhes–Matuyama reversal |
0.990 | 1.070 | 1r.1n | Jaramillo reversal |
1.770 | 1.950 | 2n | Olduvai |
2.140 | 2.150 | 2r.1n | |
2.581 | 3.040 | 2An.1n | Gauss-Matuyama reversal |
3.110 | 3.220 | 2An.2n | |
3.330 | 3.580 | 2An.3n | Gauss/Gilbert |
4.180 | 4.290 | 3n.1n | Cochiti |
4.480 | 4.620 | 3n.2n | Nunivak |
4.800 | 4.890 | 3n.3n | Sidufjall |
4.980 | 5.230 | 3n.4n | Thvera |
5.894 | 6.137 | 3An.1n | |
6.269 | 6.567 | 3An.2n | |
6.935 | 7.091 | 3Bn | |
7.135 | 7.170 | 3Br.1n | |
7.341 | 7.375 | 3Br.2n | |
7.432 | 7.562 | 4n.1n | |
7.650 | 8.072 | 4n.2n | |
8.225 | 8.257 | 4r.1n | |
8.699 | 9.025 | 4An | |
9.230 | 9.308 | 4Ar.1n | |
9.580 | 9.642 | 4Ar.2n | |
9.740 | 9.880 | 5n.1n | |
9.920 | 10.949 | 5n.2n | |
11.052 | 11.099 | 5r.1n | |
11.476 | 11.531 | 5r.2n | |
11.935 | 12.078 | 5An.1n | |
12.184 | 12.401 | 5An.2n | |
12.678 | 12.708 | 5Ar.1n | |
12.775 | 12.819 | 5Ar.2n | |
12.991 | 13.139 | 5AAn | |
13.302 | 13.510 | 5ABn | |
13.703 | 14.076 | 5ACn | |
14.178 | 14.612 | 5ADn | |
14.800 | 14.888 | 5Bn.1n | |
15.034 | 15.155 | 5Bn.2n | |
16.014 | 16.293 | 5Cn.1n | |
16.327 | 16.488 | 5Cn.2n | |
16.556 | 16.726 | 5Cn.3n | |
17.277 | 17.615 | 5Dn | |
18.281 | 18.781 | 5En | |
19.048 | 20.131 | 6n | |
20.518 | 20.725 | 6An.1n | |
20.996 | 21.320 | 6An.2n | |
21.768 | 21.859 | 6AAn | |
22.151 | 22.248 | 6AAr.1n | |
22.459 | 22.493 | 6AAr.2n | |
22.588 | 22.750 | 6Bn.1n | |
22.804 | 23.069 | 6Bn.2n | |
23.353 | 23.535 | 6Cn.1n | |
23.677 | 23.800 | 6Cn.2n | |
23.999 | 24.118 | 6Cn.3n | |
24.730 | 24.781 | 7n.1n | |
24.835 | 25.183 | 7n.2n | |
25.496 | 25.648 | 7An | |
25.823 | 25.951 | 8n.1n | |
25.992 | 26.554 | 8n.2n | |
27.027 | 27.972 | 9n | |
28.283 | 28.512 | 10n.1n | |
28.578 | 28.745 | 10n.2n | |
29.401 | 29.662 | 11n.1n | |
29.765 | 30.098 | 11n.2n | |
30.479 | 30.939 | 12n | |
33.058 | 33.545 | 13n | |
34.655 | 34.940 | 15n | |
35.343 | 35.526 | 16n.1n | |
35.685 | 36.341 | 16n.2n | |
36.618 | 37.473 | 17n.1n | |
37.604 | 37.848 | 17n.2n | |
37.920 | 38.113 | 17n.3n | |
38.426 | 39.552 | 18n.1n | |
39.631 | 40.130 | 18n.2n | |
41.257 | 41.521 | 19n | |
42.536 | 43.789 | 20n | |
46.264 | 47.906 | 21n | |
49.037 | 49.714 | 22n | |
50.778 | 50.946 | 23n.1n | |
51.047 | 51.743 | 23n.2n | |
52.364 | 52.663 | 24n.1n | |
52.757 | 52.801 | 24n.2n | |
52.903 | 53.347 | 24n.3n | |
55.904 | 56.391 | 25n | |
57.554 | 57.911 | 26n | |
60.920 | 61.276 | 27n | |
62.499 | 63.634 | 28n | |
63.976 | 64.745 | 29n | |
65.578 | 67.610 | 30n | |
67.735 | 68.737 | 31n | |
71.071 | 71.338 | 32n.1n | |
71.587 | 73.004 | 32n.2n | |
73.291 | 73.374 | 32r.1n | |
73.619 | 79.075 | 33n | |
83.000 | 118.000 | 34n |
Jaramillo normal
[edit | edit source]The Jaramillo normal event is a period of normal polarity of Earth's magnetic field during the Matumaya Reversed Epoch.[22] The Jaramillo normal event is dated to 1.06 to 0.9 million years ago in the stratigraphic record of Pleistocene epoch rocks found near Jaramillo Creek in the Valles Caldera of New Mexico.
Jaramillo reversal
[edit | edit source]The Jaramillo reversal was a geomagnetic reversal and geomagnetic excursion that occurred approximately one million years ago as a "short-term" positive reversal in the then-dominant Matuyama reversed magnetic chronozone; its beginning is widely dated to 990,000 years before the present (BP), and its end to 950,000 BP (though an alternative date of 1.07 million years ago to 990,000 is also found).[23]
One theory associates the Jaramillo with the Lake Bosumtwi impact event, as evidenced by a tektite strewnfield in the Ivory Coast,[24] though this hypothesis has been claimed as "highly speculative" and "refuted".[25]
Lake Bosumtwi
[edit | edit source]Lake Bosumtwi, the only natural lake in Ghana, is situated within an ancient impact crater that is about 10.5 kilometres (6.5 mi) in diameter.[26] It is about 30 km (19 mi) south-east of Kumasi the capital of Ashanti and is a popular recreational area, where there are about 30 villages near the crater Lake Bosumtwi, with a combined population of about 70,000.[27] The most popular amongst the villages where tourists usually settle is Abono.[28]
The Lake Bosumtwi impact crater is 10.5 km (6.5 mi) in diameter, slightly larger than the present lake which is approximately 8 km (5.0 mi) across, and is estimated to be 1.07 million years old (Pleistocene period).[29][30] There is a highly speculative theory that connects this event to the short-term Jaramillo geomagnetic reversal.[31]
The depth of crater is approximately 380 m (1,250 ft), but, if counted together with the depth of lake sediments - 750 m (2,460 ft).[32]
The crater has been partly eroded, and is situated in dense rainforest, making it difficult to study and confirm its origin by meteorite impact. Shock features such as shatter cones are largely overgrown by vegetation or covered by the lake. However, drilling of the crater's central uplift beneath the lake floor has recently provided an abundance of shocked materials for scientific study.[30] Tektites, believed to be from this impact, are found in the neighbouring country of Ivory Coast, and related microtektites have been found in deep sea sediments west of the African continent.[30]
A work based on a statistical study of past numerical orbital simulations of the impact event[33] asserts that the possible origin of the impactor is an asteroid coming from the middle main-belt at a high inclination (>17 degrees).[34]
Gauss-Matuyama reversal
[edit | edit source]The Gauss-Matuyama Reversal was a geologic event approximately 2.58 million years ago when the Earth's magnetic field underwent a geomagnetic reversal, which separates the Piacenzian from the Gelasian and marks the start of the Quaternary,[35] is useful in dating sediments.
Late Cretaceous true polar wander oscillation
[edit | edit source]A "new high-resolution palaeomagnetic record from two overlapping stratigraphic sections in Italy [...] provides evidence for a ~12° TPW oscillation from 86 to 78 Ma."[36]
"True polar wander (TPW) is the reorientation of a planet or moon in order to align the body’s greatest nonhydrostatic principal axis of inertia (Imax) with the spin axis1,2,3,4. On Earth, TPW is achieved by wholesale rotation of the solid, silicate Earth (mantle and crust) around the liquid outer core. As Earth’s magnetic pole is tied primarily to rotationally induced excitations of the outer core, the magnetic poles remain aligned with the rotation axis through a TPW event. Thus, palaeomagnetic data record TPW as the coherent, simultaneous motion of all coeval rocks about a single equatorial Euler pole defined by Earth’s minimum moment of inertia (Imin). Palaeomagnetic sampling of a continuous sedimentary succession is an effective single-locality test of TPW as it eliminates potential caveats such as differential remagnetization and tectonic structure5,6."[36]
Neoproterozoic
[edit | edit source]Def. "a geologic era within the Proterozoic eon; comprises the Tonian, Cryogenian and Ediacaran periods from about 1000 to 544 million years ago, when algae and sponges flourished"[37] is called the Neoproterozoic.
Ediacaran
[edit | edit source]"In the central Flinders Ranges the 4.5 km thick Umberatana Group encompasses the two main phases of glacial deposition (see Thomas et al., 2012). The carbonaceous, calcareous and pyritic Tindelpina Shale Member, of the interglacial Tapley Hill Formation, caps the Fe-rich diamictite and tillite formations of the Sturt glaciation. The upper Cryogenian glacials of the Elatina Formation are truncated by the Nuccaleena Formation at the base of the Wilpena Group and the Ediacaran System."[38]
At "the end of a period called Ediacara, in which there already existed forms of simple multicellular life resembling jelly-fish, the magnetic field of Earth reversed itself several times in a short lapse of time. [These] reversals [may have] occurred at a rate 20 [times] faster on average than in the past million years."[39]
“Earth’s magnetic field underwent a period of hyperactive reversals. One can deduce from this that the magnetic field of Earth must have been weaker on average during several episodes over a period of several million years."[39]
The "cosmic ray bombardment occurring then would have been sufficient to significantly damage the ozone layer, reducing it by some 40 % on average all over the planet. And less ozone means decreased protection against ultraviolet rays for species living at the surface of Earth, on land and in the oceans. Curiously, these febrile reversals coincide with [...] the crisis of the Kotlinian, which decimated the fauna of Ediacara wholesale, right before the Cambrian Explosion."[39]
"The Kotlinian Crisis, as it is known, saw widespread extinction and put an end to the Ediacaran Period. During this time, large (up to meter-sized) soft-bodied organisms [such as in the image on the left], often shaped like discs or fronds, had lived on or in shallow horizontal burrows beneath thick mats of bacteria which, unlike today, coated the sea floor. The slimy mats acted as a barrier between the water above and the sediments below, preventing oxygen from reaching under the sea floor and making it largely uninhabitable."[40]
"The Ediacaran gave way to the Cambrian explosion, 542 million years ago: the rapid emergence of new species with complex body plans, hard parts for defense, and sophisticated eyes. Burrowing also became more common and varied, which broke down the once-widespread bacterial mats, allowing oxygen into the sea floor to form a newly hospitable space for living."[40]
"Organisms with the ability to escape UV radiation would be favored in such an environment. This flight from dangerous levels of UV light might explain many of the evolutionary changes that occurred during the Late Ediacaran and Early Cambrian."[39]
"Creatures with complex eyes to sense the light and the ability to seek shelter from the radiation—for example, by migrating into deeper waters during the daytime—would have been more successful. The growth of hard coatings and shells would afford additional UV protection, as would the capacity to burrow deeper into the sea floor."[40]
"In turn, these changes may have opened up new environments. The development of shells, for example, helps creatures colonize intertidal areas, protected not only from UV rays but also stronger waves and the risk of drying out."[40]
"In 2004, the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the terminal Proterozoic was placed near the base of the Nuccaleena Formation in Enorama Creek in the central Flinders Ranges [in the image on the right], thus establishing the Ediacaran System and Period (Knoll et al., 2006). As the Nuccaleena Formation has not been accurately dated, a date of c. 635 Ma from near-correlative levels in Namibia and China is presumed for the base of the Ediacaran (Hoffmann et al., 2004; Condon et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005)."[38]
Hypotheses
[edit | edit source]- Magnetic field reversals affect the local magnetic fields within crystallizing liquids.
- Magnetic field reversals may cause the ionosphere to contact the surface of the Earth during the reversal period.
- Magnetic field reversals may allow increased radiation to irradiate the upper crustal rocks to significant depths during the reversal period.
- Subject to the origin of magnetic field reversals, they may cause significant increases in volcanic activity during the reversal period.
- Magnetic field reversals of the Sun occur with the sunspot cycle which may have its origins in enhanced electron current from Jupiter and Venus when perihelion is coincident.
See also
[edit | edit source]References
[edit | edit source]- ↑ 1.0 1.1 I. Matsuyama, J. X. Mitrovica, M. Manga, J. T. Perron and M. A. Richards (February 2006). "Rotational stability of dynamic planets with elastic lithospheres". Journal of Geophysical Research Planets 111 (E2): 1991-2012. doi:10.1029/2005JE002447. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2005JE002447/full. Retrieved 2014-07-15.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Lisa Neef, Sophia Walther, Katja Matthes, and Kunihiko Kodera (August 2014). "Observations of stratospheric sudden warmings in Earth rotation variations". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 119 (16): 9666-78. doi:10.1002/2014JD021621. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014JGRD..119.9666N. Retrieved 2015-06-18.
- ↑ G. Eagles, K. Gohl, and R. Larter (6-11 April 2003). "Animated reconstruction of gravity anomalies in the Bellingshausen and Amundsen Seas". EGS - AGU - EUG Joint Assembly, Abstracts: #1369. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003EAEJA.....1369E. Retrieved 2015-06-18.
- ↑ J. Royer, C. Deplus, J. Goslin, P. Patriat, and C.Widiwijayanyi (December 2001). "Intraplate Deformation in the Central and Eastern Indian Ocean: Results from a Swath-Bathymetry Survey (MD118-Deflo Cruise)". American Geophysical Union, Abstracts: #T11A-0844. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AGUFM.T11A0844R. Retrieved 2015-06-18.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 David M. Raup (28 March 1985). "Magnetic reversals and mass extinctions". Nature 314 (6009): 341-3. doi:10.1038/314341a0. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v314/n6009/abs/314341a0.html. Retrieved 2015-06-17.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Richard B. Stothers (31 July 1986). "Periodicity of the Earth's magnetic reversals". Nature 322 (6078): 444-6. doi:10.1038/322444a0. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v322/n6078/abs/322444a0.html. Retrieved 2015-06-17.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Frank C. Bassinot, Laurent D. Labeyrie, Edith Vincent, Xavier Quidelleur, Nicholas J. Shackleton, Yves Lancelot (August 1994). "The astronomical theory of climate and the age of the Brunhes-Matuyama magnetic reversal". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 126 (1-3): 91-108. doi:10.1016/0012-821X(94)90244-5. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0012821X94902445. Retrieved 2015-06-17.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Massimo Cortini and Christopher C. Barton (September 1994). "Chaos in geomagnetic reversal records: A comparison between Earth's magnetic field data and model disk dynamo data". Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (B9): 18,021-33. doi:10.1029/94JB01237. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994JGR....9918021C. Retrieved 2015-06-18.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Bruce A. Buffett (16 June 2000). "Earth's Core and the Geodynamo". Science 288 (5473): 2007-12. doi:10.1126/science.288.5473.2007. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/288/5473/2007.full. Retrieved 2015-06-17.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Bruce A. Buffett, Leah Ziegler, and Cathy G. Constable (October 2013). "A stochastic model for palaeomagnetic field variations". Geophysical Journal 195 (1): 86-97. doi:10.1093/gji/ggt218. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013GeoJI.195...86B. Retrieved 2015-06-17.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 D. Van Rooij, N. Zaazi, N. Fagel, M. Boone, V. Cnudde, J. Dewanckele, H. Pirlet, U. Rohl, D. Blamart, J.-P. Henriet, P. Jacobs, H. Houbrechts, P. Duyck, and R. Swennen (2009). "3D anatomy of Heinrich Layer 2". Geophysical Research Abstracts 11 (EGU2009-4809-1): 1. http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2009/EGU2009-4809-1.pdf. Retrieved 2014-09-29.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 Edward A. Mankinen and Carl M. Wentworth (10 June 2003). Preliminary Paleomagnetic Results from the Coyote Creek Outdoor Classroom Drill Hole, Santa Clara Valley, California. U.S. Geological Survey. http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of03-187/. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 Norbert R. Nowaczyk and Helge Arz (16 October 2012). Ice age polarity reversal was global event: Extremely brief reversal of geomagnetic field, climate variability, and super volcano. ScienceDaily: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121016084936.htm. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 Axel Bojanowski (26 April 2017). Old African huts reassure us about the geomagnetic field. Q-Magazine. http://www.q-mag.org/old-african-huts-reassure-us-about-the-geomagnetic-field.html. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 John Tarduno (26 April 2017). Old African huts reassure us about the geomagnetic field. Q-Magazine. http://www.q-mag.org/old-african-huts-reassure-us-about-the-geomagnetic-field.html. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Stephanie Pappas (13 February 2017). Huge spike in geomagnetic field recorded in 8th century B.C. ceramic pottery. Q-Magazine. http://www.q-mag.org/huge-spike-in-geomagnetic-field-recorded-in-8th-century-b-c-ceramic-pottery.html. Retrieved 2017-05-29.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 Rae Ellen Bichell (14 February 2017). Iron Age Potters Carefully Recorded Earth's Magnetic Field — By Accident. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/14/515032512/iron-age-potters-carefully-recorded-earths-magnetic-field-by-accident. Retrieved 2017-05-30.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Erez Ben-Yosef (14 February 2017). Iron Age Potters Carefully Recorded Earth's Magnetic Field — By Accident. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/14/515032512/iron-age-potters-carefully-recorded-earths-magnetic-field-by-accident. Retrieved 2017-05-30.
- ↑ Steven Forman (14 February 2017). Iron Age Potters Carefully Recorded Earth's Magnetic Field — By Accident. National Public Radio. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/14/515032512/iron-age-potters-carefully-recorded-earths-magnetic-field-by-accident. Retrieved 2017-05-30.
- ↑ G. H. Jones and A. Balogh (6 April 2003). Reversal of the solar magnetic dipole as observed at Ulysses. Nice, France: EGU. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003EAEJA....12221J. Retrieved 2015-06-19.
- ↑ Cande, S.C., and D.V. Kent, Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 6,093-6,095, 1995.
- ↑ Glen, William (1982). The Road to Jaramillo. Stanford University Press. https://archive.org/details/roadtojaramilloc00glen.
- ↑ Herrero-Bervera, Emilio, and S. Keith Runcorn. "Transition Fields during the Geomagnetic Reversals and Their Geodynamic Significance." Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 355 No. 1730 (September 15, 1997), pp. 1713–42.
- ↑ Glass, B. P., Swincki, M. B., & Zwart, P. A. (1979). "Australasian, Ivory Coast and North American tektite strewnfields - Size, mass and correlation with geomagnetic reversals and other earth events" Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 10th, Houston, Tex., March 19–23, 1979, p. 2535-2545.
- ↑ Vincent Courtillot. Evolutionary Catastrophes: The Science of Mass Extinction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999; p. 104.
- ↑ "Bosumtwi". LakeNet. Retrieved 2007-02-18.
- ↑ "Lake Bosomtwi". touringghana.com. 2016-03-27. Retrieved 2019-06-08.
- ↑ Adom, Dickson (2018-01-01). "The human impact and the aquatic biodiversity of lake Bosomtwe: rennaisance of the cultural traditions of Abono (Ghana)?". Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research 20 (1): 87–110. doi:10.1515/trser-2018-0007. ISSN 2344-3219.
- ↑ "Bosumtwi". Earth Impact Database. Planetary and Space Science Centre University of New Brunswick Fredericton. Retrieved 2009-08-12.
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 Koeberl, C.; Milkereit, B.; Overpeck, J.T.; Scholz, C.A.; Amoako, P.Y.O.; Boamah, D.; Danuor, S.; Karp, T. et al. (2007). "An international and multidisciplinary drilling project into a young complex impact structure: The 2004 ICDP Bosumtwi Crater Drilling Project—An overview". Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42 (4–5): 483–511. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01057.x. http://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:236501.
- ↑ Glass, B. P.; Swincki, M. B.; Zwart, P. A. (1979). "Australasian, Ivory Coast and North American tektit strewnfields: Size, mass and correlation with geomagnetic reversals and other earth events". Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 10. pp. 2535. Bibcode: 1979LPSC...10.2535G.
- ↑ "Lake Bosumtwi". Wondermondo. 2013-02-09.
- ↑ Artemieva, N.; Karp, T.; Milkereit, B. (2004). "Investigating the Lake Bosumtwi impact structure: Insight from numerical modeling". Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 5 (11): Q11016. doi:10.1029/2004GC000733.
- ↑ Galiazzo, M. A.; Bazsó, Á.; Huber, M. S.; Losiak, A.; Dvorak, R.; Koeberl, C. (2013). "A statistical dynamical study of meteorite impactors: A case study based on parameters derived from the Bosumtwi impact event". Astronomische Nachrichten 334 (9): 936–939. doi:10.1002/asna.201211964.
- ↑ Clague, John et al. (2006) "Open Letter by INQUA Executive Committee" Quaternary Perspective, the INQUA Newsletter International Union for Quaternary Research 16(1): Retrieved 2006-09-23
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 Ross N. Mitchell, Christopher J. Thissen, David A. D. Evans, Sarah P. Slotznick, Rodolfo Coccioni, Toshitsugu Yamazaki & Joseph L. Kirschvink (15 June 2021). "A Late Cretaceous true polar wander oscillation". Nature Communications 12: 3629. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23803-8. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
- ↑ SemperBlotto (31 May 2005). Neoproterozoic. San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Neoproterozoic. Retrieved 2015-02-13.
- ↑ 38.0 38.1 James G. Gehling and Mary L. Droser (March 2012). "Ediacaran stratigraphy and the biota of the Adelaide Geosyncline, South Australia". Episodes 35 (1): 236-46. http://www.episodes.co.in/contents/2012/march/p236-246.pdf. Retrieved 2015-01-19.
- ↑ 39.0 39.1 39.2 39.3 Joseph Meert (19 February 2016). Flight from light: Is Earth' magnetic field responsible for the Cambrian Explosion?. Magazine of Quantavolution. http://www.q-mag.org/flight-from-lightis-earth-magnetic-field-responsible-for-the-cambrian-explosion.html. Retrieved 2017-05-31.
- ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 Ian Randall (19 February 2016). Flight from light: Is Earth' magnetic field responsible for the Cambrian Explosion?. Science. http://www.q-mag.org/flight-from-lightis-earth-magnetic-field-responsible-for-the-cambrian-explosion.html. Retrieved 2017-05-31.
External links
[edit | edit source]- International Astronomical Union
- NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database - NED
- NASA's National Space Science Data Center
- Office of Scientific & Technical Information
- The SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System
- Scirus for scientific information only advanced search
- SDSS Quick Look tool: SkyServer
- SIMBAD Astronomical Database
- SIMBAD Web interface, Harvard alternate
- Spacecraft Query at NASA.
- Universal coordinate converter
{{Geology resources}}{{Radiation astronomy resources}}