Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Therapeutic horticulture

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed) 2. Headings Basic, 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Write for an international rather than Australian audience Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios) Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended 4. Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with some relevant citations Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression such as checking grammatical and spelling errors Conclusion (the most important section): 5. Figure Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented, captioned, and cited 6. Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles Also link to other relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) 8. Resources See also Very good Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters) Use alphabetical order External links Not developed 9. User page Not created – see Tutorial 02 10. Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Great topic

After having a quick read of your work, this sounds like a really interesting topic to explore

Annabelle Taylor (discuss • contribs) 04:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)