Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Messy heading structure – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
Definition(s) tend to be pedestrian headings. Incorporate definitional material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information.
Excellent – key points are well developed for each section
Promising development of key points for each section
Basic development of key points for each section
Partial development of key points for some sections
No development
Excellent use of citations
Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
Reduce the initial material and expand the material about the relationship between WB and genes/environment
Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Move links to references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
At least three different types of contributions with indirect link(s) to evidence
To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.