Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Stockholm syndrome motivation

Heading casing

Hi U3243508. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions Put the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic Put the focus questions into a feature box at the end of the Overview Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Check consistency of capitalisation (e.g., should be Stockholm syndrome) The initial sections lack relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Use bullet-points rather than dashes (see Tutorial 2) There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research Conclusion (the most important section): Under developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Excellent Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check: provide dois (where available) rather than other URLs capitalisation italicisation doi formatting remove quotation marks from titles 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Add link to book chapter 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence Also consider making direct improvements to other book chapters (past or current) and providing feedback on chapter discussion pages Use a numbered list (as demonstrated in Tutorial 2)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)