Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Stockholm syndrome motivation

Heading casing

Hi U3243508. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Inclusion of images

Hello, I've just finished reading your book chapter and found it to be very interesting! The only thing I would recommend is perhaps including some more images throughout the chapter. This gives the reader something interesting to look at alongside all of the information that you have included. --U3236447 (discuss • contribs) 08:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions Put the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic Put the focus questions into a feature box at the end of the Overview Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Check consistency of capitalisation (e.g., should be Stockholm syndrome) The initial sections lack relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Use bullet-points rather than dashes (see Tutorial 2) There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research Conclusion (the most important section): Under developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Excellent Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check: provide dois (where available) rather than other URLs capitalisation italicisation doi formatting remove quotation marks from titles 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Add link to book chapter 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence Also consider making direct improvements to other book chapters (past or current) and providing feedback on chapter discussion pages Use a numbered list (as demonstrated in Tutorial 2)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Referencing

Hi there! I have really enjoyed reading your chapter so far! You have included heaps of information, just a friendly reminder to include your references in the subtitle 'what is Stockholm syndrome'. --Jacqueline Di Fronzo (discuss • contribs) 09:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Interesting Case

Hello! This chapter is looking very interesting! Have you heard of the famous Stockholm Syndrome case of Patty Hearst? It really fascinated me when I learnt about it a few years ago and it may assist you in the writing of this chapter. --IvaPuskarica (discuss • contribs) 05:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback

Hi U3243508, this was a great read! I thought I was going to find an article to help copyedit, but you've done a great job.

Some feedback or options for improvement, in my opinion are:

Scenario Introduction: While the initial scenario sets the tone, it could benefit from more specificity about the counselling process or the challenges faced by professionals dealing with Stockholm Syndrome cases. This would provide more context for how theory applies to practice.

Controversy Section: The critique of Stockholm Syndrome as a diagnosis is well-placed, but it might benefit from more exploration of the social and cultural implications of the label. Addressing how media shapes public perceptions of victims could improve the analysis.

Quizes: I love the types of questions you put in, and it could be beneficial to spread these throughout the text to encourage readers to apply knowledge as they progress.

Goodluck finishing up the assignment :) U3225022 (discuss • contribs) 10:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an outstanding chapter. It successfully integrates psychological theory and research in a highly readable way to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon The focus questions are clear and relevant Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds exceptionally well on other chapters and Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Excellent use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is outstanding (highly professional) Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent Grammar Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[1] APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[2]. Video (1 min) Figures Well captioned Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Tables Use APA style for captions (see example) Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.) References use excellent APA style: Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles Use internal linking style for embedded links per Tutorial 02 No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Excellent use of figure(s) Excellent use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~26 logged, useful, mostly major contributions with direct links to evidence Thanks very much for your extensive contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview The opening clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses/somewhat addresses/does not adequately address the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic/ use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples The presentation provides useful practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Provide easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an excellent summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides excellent take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was good Recording volume varied somewhat between slides/sections The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes creative use of stock video, text, images, and/or animation The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in an excellent way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is very well produced The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation An excellent written description of the presentation is provided Excellent use of time codes Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)