Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Power motivation and leadership

Suggestions

Hello, The chapter on power motivation and leadership is well structured and engaging. The introduction effectively draws readers in with a relatable scenario, making complex concepts more accessible. The structure, featuring clear subheadings and examples, is both informative and well presented, allowing for a smooth flow of ideas. The scientific foundation, especially the discussion of leadership theories, is strong but could be further enhanced by deepening the connection between these theories and the role of power motivation in leadership dynamics. This would add theoretical depth and provide greater insight. Overall, with a bit more detail, the chapter does a good job of explaining the psychological significance of power motivation in leadership. well done! --Princess Brutus (discuss • contribs) 08:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Articles that might be helpful.

Hey @Zainab Zaman! I ran across an article related to the impact of power motivation on leadership efficacy, with the dark triad as mediating corollaries. I hope it helps your chapter! Here's the DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000481. D. E. Finlay (discuss • contribs) 04:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Initial suggestions

@Zainab Zaman: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Leadership
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Power motivation
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello

@Zainab Zaman

I had just found your book chapter and I think it seems like a very intresting topic. I think you may find an article called THE EFFECTS OF LEADERSHIP STYLES ON TEAM MOTIVATION by Dana Al Rahbi, Khalizani Khalid, and Mehmood Khan a very intresting read. As well as Gender Differences in Leadership Role Occupancy: The Mediating Role of Power Motivation by Sebastian C. Schuh, Alina S. Hernandez Bark, Niels Van Quaquebeke, Rüdiger Hossiep, Philip Frieg & Rolf Van Dick intresting as well if you have no already read it. I would also suggest looking into the dark triad theory as narcissism and machiavelliasm are closely related to achieving power and using ruthless leadership to keep it. And I think the book, 'Surrounded by idiots' is always a fun read as it relates to group dynamics Joan-E-1405 (discuss • contribs) 05:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi Zainab Zaman. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions 4. Key points Key points are well developed for most sections Many of the key points lack sufficient citation Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples Conclusion (the most important section): Underway Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info 5. Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. 7. References Very good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) 8. Resources See also Excellent Use alphabetical order External links Very good Move academic sources into references and cite in the chapter Use sentence casing 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Link(s) provided to professional profile(s) A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence The other types of contribution are making: direct improvements to other book chapters (past or current) Use a numbered list – see Tutorial 02

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

social contribution

hey, I've just read your book chapter and found the integration of leadership theories really interesting and adds a lot of depth to your book chapter. it would be really interesting to see power motivation in different cultural contexts. you have done an amazing job so far i really enjoyed reading your chapter :) U3236683 (discuss • contribs) 20:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient chapter. It makes good use of psychological theory and insufficient use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. I suspect that some of this chapter is based on unacknowledged use of genAI content; if so, it violates academic integrity principles There are several awkward uses of citations and a lack of citations in some places (e.g., see the tags) For additional feedback, see the following comments and [ these copyedits] Overview Reasonably good Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box; also include a relevant image Briefly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon; provide more detail The focus questions are clear and relevant The focus questions could be improved by being: open-ended rather than closed-ended Theory A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds on two previous chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Build more strongly on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles (e.g., by embedding interwiki links for key terms) Reasonably good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Some use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Some use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Insufficient review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Insufficient integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Conclusion Insufficient summary and conclusion Reads like generic genAI content Take-home messages? Answers to focus questions? Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is OK but there are several aspects which are below professional standard Bullet points are overused. Develop more of the bullet point statements into full sentences and paragraphs. Use gender-neutral language (e.g., mankind -> humankind, s/he -> they) Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional italics, bold, and/or change in font size) See earlier comments about heading casing Proofreading Remove unnecessary capitalisation – more info Figures Briefly captioned; provide more detail to help connect the figure to the text Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., "(see Figure 1)") Tables Add an APA style caption to each table Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1) References use basic APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation Check and correct use of italicisation Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Include hyperlinked dois (fixed) Learning features Basic use of learning features Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of figure(s) Reasonably good use of table(s) Reasonably good use of feature box(es) Basic use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Add more links Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Add more links Social contribution 3 ~3 logged, useful, moderate contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit. Content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes. Overview The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a basic way Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses/somewhat addresses/does not adequately address the topic There is too much content, in too much detail. Provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of content well than a large amount poorly. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes insufficient/no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples The presentation provides good practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Reasonably good intonation The narration could benefit from further scripting and/or practice Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is basic The presentation makes reasonably good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a reasonably good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. A reasonably good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)