Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Move the image into the scenario feature box to help attract reader interest. Probably make the image smaller.
A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
The only relevant focus question is the last one. The other focus questions are too broad (i.e., not sufficiently specific to this topic).
Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
Conclusion (the most important section):
Hasn't been developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
posts about the unit or project on other platforms
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.
To add direct links to evidence: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
"People" is often a better term than "individuals"
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
Spelling
Many words are misspelt (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.
Latest comment: 15 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.