Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Nudge theory

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestions

[edit source]

@U3225022: Thanks for tackling this topic.↵Some initial suggestions:

Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:

  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Behaviour
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Environment
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Motivation

Also search past book chapters for related topics For the topic development, consider: What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic? What is the main research in this area? Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

[edit source]
Hi U3225022. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed)
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic.
  3. No heading needed for case studies. Instead, embed case studies/scenarios throughout the chapter.
  4. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  1. Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
  2. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest.
  3. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Promising balance of theory and research. Ideally, synthesise and provide examples.
  3. Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Underway
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Use Australian spelling
  5. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Very good
  2. Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
  1. See also
    1. OK
    2. Use internal linking style (see Tutorial 02)
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Use sentence casing. Note that Youtube should be YouTube
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. Several of the links are broken
  2. Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making:
    1. direct improvements to other chapters (past or current)
  3. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply