Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Grit and conscientiousness

Initial suggestions

@U3229789: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Personality/Conscientiousness
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Grit
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?

Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi U3229789. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you :) U3229789 (discuss • contribs) 12:30, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

How to make hanging referencing

Hi U3229789. Here's some formatting to add into your reference list so that the references are hanging:

{{Hanging indent|1=

Copy your references here

}}

U3225022 (discuss • contribs) 02:52, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment The Overview should not have sub-headings (I've fixed) 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Remove case study from focus questions; make these questions more generic 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research Conclusion (the most important section): Underway 5. Figure A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view 6. Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters; but do not put the links in bold Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. 7. References Excellent For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation 8. Resources See also Excellent Use alphabetical order External links Excellent Use alphabetical order 9. User page Very good Brief description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter 10. Social contribution At least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC)