Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Ego resilience

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity
Latest comment: 9 days ago by Jtneill in topic Heading casing

Heading casing

[edit source]
Hi U322995. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@U322995: This is a reminder about heading capitalisation. Also note that "Ego" should "ego" throughout the chapter. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed)
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
  3. Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
  4. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest.
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned
  3. Direct quotes need page numbers. Even better, write about concepts using your own words.
  4. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  5. Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. Move links to academic articles into the References
  5. Move links to external resources into External links
  6. Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info (e.g., Ego should be ego)
  7. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Insufficient
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Don't cite the image. Clicking on the image provides the meta-data.
  4. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  5. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    4. use dois where available instead of other links
  6. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  1. See also
    1. Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  2. External links
    1. Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2)
  1. Basic – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply