@U322995 : This is a reminder about heading capitalisation. Also note that "Ego" should "ego" throughout the chapter. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC) Reply
The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed)
See earlier comment about Heading casing
Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest.
A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned
Direct quotes need page numbers. Even better, write about concepts using your own words.
Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions
Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
Move links to academic articles into the References
Move links to external resources into External links
Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info (e.g., Ego should be ego)
Conclusion (the most important section):
Hasn't been developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned
The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
Promising use of quiz question(s)
Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
Insufficient
Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
Don't cite the image. Clicking on the image provides the meta-data.
Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
Check and correct APA referencing style :
capitalisation
italicisation
make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
use dois where available instead of other links
Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
See also
Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2 )
External links
Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2 )
Basic – minimal, but sufficient
Very brief description about self – consider expanding
Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
A link to the book chapter is provided
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03 ). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions .
-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Reply