Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Adverse childhood experiences and emotion regulation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestions

[edit source]

@U3242902: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. I've tweaked the title and sub-title to be consistent with the book table of contents.
  1. Use sentence casing for theories (e.g., see casing on Wikipedia for these theories)
  2. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
  3. Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  1. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  3. Some promising development
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  5. Move focus questions into a feature box
  6. I've done some revisions - see what you think
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. Adverse Childhood Experience should not capitalised (APA style)
  3. There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research
  4. Use APA style 7th edition for citations (e.g., do not include author initials)
  5. Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info
  6. I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression, particularly correction of grammatical and spelling errors.
  7. Use bullet-points as demonstrated in Tutorial 2
  8. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
  1. A relevant figure is presented and captioned
  2. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style
  1. Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Move external links to the external links section
Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  1. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. OK
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  4. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. doi formatting
    4. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    5. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Not developed
  1. Very good
  2. Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. The other type of contribution is making:
    1. comments on chapters (past or current)
  3. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply