Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/System justification theory

Initial suggestions

@Ishi: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work.
• However, note that although this is a social psychological topic, bring a motivation lens to the chapter e.g., by discussing system justification goal(s)/motive(s)

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Small things

Hey, this topic is looking really interesting, I'm excited to follow along as you post more. I did notice that your figure is currently without a description, adding one could help further develop the visual learning aspect of this chapter. :]--H.Maycock (discuss • contribs) 12:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted I've removed the user name – authorship is as per the list of topics and the page's editing history Headings Poor structure Simplify to 2 levels Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Quizzes and case studies don't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions and case studies within relevant sections Overview Add a scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section Key points Partial development of key points for some sections, with limited citations Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan It will be important to situate/relate SJT to motivation Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed Figure A figure is presented Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of quiz question(s) Consider including more examples/case studies, table(s) etc. References OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: alphabetical order capitalisation italicisation Resources See also Not developed External links Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02) Include source in brackets after link User page Not created – see Tutorial 02 Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand Well over the maximum word count. The content beyond 4,000 words has been ignored for marking purposes. This chapter "beats around the bush" for ~* words (i.e., too much preamble) before starting to directly tackle the target topic in the section titled "*" For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed/Solid/Reasonably good/Basic/Underdeveloped Engage reader interest via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image. This is underway, but incomplete. Explains the problem or phenomenon Clear focus questions Consider using single-barrelled rather than double-barrelled questions Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on related Wikipedia articles Build more strongly on related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Basic use of tables, figures, and/or lists are to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Some places lacked sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Very good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Very good integration between theory and research Conclusion Reasonably good summary and conclusion Wishy-washy Remind the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest Key points are well summarised Address the focus questions Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Develop the bullet points into full sentences and paragraphs Avoid one sentence paragraphs. Convey one idea per paragraph using three to five sentences. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Abbreviations Once an abbreviation has been established (e.g., PTSD), use it consistently aftwarwards Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour) Proofreading Remove unnecessary capitalisation APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, write in your own words Figures Figures are very well captioned Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations use basic APA style (7th ed.). For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Check and correct how to present two different citations in parentheses A full stop is needed after "et al" (i.e., "et al.") because it is an abbreviation of et alii Do not include author first name or initials Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Good use of feature box(es) Very good use of case studies or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Use bullet points per Tutorial 02 Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Include sources in parentheses Social contribution No logged social contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes insufficient use of relevant psychological research Ideally, make more explicit use of research The presentation makes insufficient use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice Conclusion The presentation could be improved by presenting a Conclusion slide with a summary of key points and/or take-home messages An audio conclusion is presented with basic take-home message(s) An audio conclusion provides a basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory but not research about this topic The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit Audio The presentation makes good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Very good intonation The narration is well/ practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was basic Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic Video Overall, visual display quality is basic The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read The visual communication is supplemented in a rbasic way by images Also consider using diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is provided Links to and from the book chapter are provided An active hyperlink to the book chapter is provided Licensing Provide clickable links to the original image sources (e.g., in the description) Image sources are communicated in a general way. Also provide links to each image and the license details (e.g., in the description). A legitimate copyright license for the presentation is not provided Provide a copyright license for the presentation is provided in the meta-data copyright field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)