Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Morning routine and motivation

Initial suggestions

@U3216585: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Habit
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Sleep
• What psychological theories can help to understand? What is the main research in this area?

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Research Article Suggestions

This is really interesting and I look forward to seeing this book chapter develop,

I thought I would help find some possible research journals, I hope they help,

- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0005796718301621

- https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-49108-6_5

-https://www.proquest.com/openview/eb00835576309fc32f0328faf5d3d572/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Feel free to check out my book chapter, I find to do lists especially for children help to make mornings run smooth ~~~ U3162169T (discuss • contribs) 10:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Scenario Layout Suggestion

This looks like a really cool topic.

I like the scenario you used and that it is relatable. I thought if you used a feature box to help it stand out!

U3197031 (discuss • contribs) 07:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Article Suggestion

It looks like you have some great ideas for your page. I found a peer-reviewed article which you may find interesting or could help you in your research. This article in particular talks about what happens when your morning routine is disrupted and how it can affect work engagement. --U3223849 (discuss • contribs) 01:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

McClean, S., Koopman, J., Yim, J., & Klotz, A. C. (2021). Stumbling out of the gate: The energy‐based implications of morning routine disruption. Personnel Psychology, 74(3), 411–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12419 --U3223849 (discuss • contribs) 01:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Feedback and suggestions

Hey there! I think that you have a really interesting topic for your book chapter and that is it coming along really well. After reading it however, I do have a few suggestions that I think could improve it

1. In your overview where you have "Key concepts of a morning routine to maximise motivation, productivity, and well-being:" I think you should move this to a different section. It just seems a bit odd in my opinion to have it in the overview. Perhaps create a morning routine section. 2. I think you have some great focus questions but perhaps consider shortening them. I have found when I am reading other chapters, including yours, I tend to forget the focus questions due to there being so many. I find 3 focus questions to be the sweet spot Maybe narrow them down too.... What is motivation? What affects motivation, productivity, and well-being (such as sleep, sunlight, temperature and caffeine)? How can we optimise our morning routine to maximise motivation, productivity, and well-being? 3. I think instead of your sections being titled - sleep, sunlight, temp and exercise, perhaps reduce it to productivity and well-being, then fit sleep, sunlight, temp and exercise into those sections. 4. Adding a case study is a great way to add the readers attention. I have seen other people create one case study at the beginning of the book chapter and then link that individual with the rest of the sections. I unfortunately can't see myself doing that with my chapter due to my topic, but I think it would be really great for yours. e.g: Case study one in overview: Emma is not a morning person... Case study two in temperature-cold shower section: Emma has started taking cold showers, waking up in the morning is easier ... or something like that. 5. Remember that we need to put our non-academic sources in the 'external links' section ...... - Hame, S. L. (2023, January 25). 6 Cold Shower Benefits to Consider. UCLAHealth. https://www.uclahealth.org/news/6-cold-shower-benefits-consider - After Skool. (2022, September 8). The Optimal Morning Routine - Andrew Huberman [Video file]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR_f-iwUGY4&ab_channel=AfterSkool

Overall, I think you have a=done a great job of your chapter and I really look forward to reading it when it is done. Let me know if you have any questions --Alice hatcher (discuss • contribs) 12:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Remove "What is motivation?" as a heading; too broad. Incorporate brief description with link to further in Overview or other sections as needed. Maybe split the role of caffeine and exercise into separate sections Promising alignment between focus questions and heading structure Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections How to optimise could be a useful extra heading Overview Put the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Avoid providing too much detail in this section Promising alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section Remove "What is motivation?" as a focus question Use single- rather than double-barrelled focus questions Put focus questions in a feature box at the end of the section Key points Promising development of key points for each section No citations Use bullet points (see Tutorial 02) For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed Figure A relevant figure is presented and captioned Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text Learning feature Scenario in Overview Consider including interwiki links, more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. References All references should be cited Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links OK Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation provide full journal names include page numbers Resources See also Excellent External links Very good Use sentence casing User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution One types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence How to do social contributions is covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient chapter mainly because the content is largely about sleep rather than psychological theory and research about optimal morning routines. The chapter is also fatally flawed by the lack of citation of peer-reviewed literature upon which the claims are based. Insufficient use of primary, peer-reviewed sources as citations This chapter "beats around the bush" For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader interest by presenting a case study and/or scenario in a feature box; also include a relevant image Ideally, follow-up this case study with a case study depicting an ideal morning routine (i.e., solution) Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Convert learning outcomes to focus questions Theory Insufficient use of relevant psychological theory about this topic Most of the theory is about aspect of the circadian rhythm and sleep rather than being more targetted about morning routines Reduce general theoretical background (e.g., about sleep). Instead, summarise and link to related resources (i.e., other book chapters and/or Wikipedia articles). Increase emphasis on substantive aspects of theory that relate directly to the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question). Builds effectively on related Wikipedia articles Build more strongly on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Basic depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Use tables, figures, and/or lists are to help convey key theoretical information Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Some use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Insufficient review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Many claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags) Integration Insufficient integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research Conclusion Insufficient as a cohesive summary of the best available psychological theory and research about the topic Key points are summarised in a basic way Add practical, take-home message(s) in response to focus questions Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is promising but below professional standard due to insufficient citation of the best peer-reviewed theory and research about this topic Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[1]. Video (1 min) Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Express numbers < 10 using words (e.g., two) and >= 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 99) Figures Figures are very well captioned Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: A full stop is needed after "et al" (i.e., "et al.") because it is an abbreviation of et alii Very limited reference list References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Learning features Reasonably good use of learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Move links to non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Very good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Basic use of case studies or examples No use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Also include links to related Wikipedia articles Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is established Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes implied use of relevant psychological research Ideally, make more explicit use of research Include citations to support claims The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s) However, the narration of the conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was OK. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content) Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools The presentation videod a computer screen rather than using screencasting to capture the screen The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is provided Links to and from the book chapter are provided An active hyperlink to the book chapter is provided The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info. Licensing Ideally, provide clickable links to the original image sources (e.g., in the description) Image sources are communicated in a general way. Also provide links to each image and the license details (e.g., in the description). A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)