Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi! super interested in your topic of choice as i have recently completed an assignment on the HBM. I have left some extra resources related to this topic that might be useful in the progression of your book chapter!
Champion, V. L., & Skinner, C. S. (2008). The health belief model. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 4, 45-65.
Sulat, J., Prabandari, Y. S., Sanusi, R., Hapsari, E. D., & Santoso, B. (2018). The validity of health belief model variables in predicting behavioral change: A scoping review. Health Education (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 118(6), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-05-2018-0027----U3229619 (discuss • contribs) 22:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.
Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence
If adding the second or subsequent link to a page, create a direct link like this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
The planning is quite basic; expand to show more detail about the best available psychological theory and research on this topic, with illustrative examples/case studies
Overview - Consider:
adding a brief, evocative description of the problem
revising the focus questions to better align with the sub-title and planned headings
an image
an example or case study
Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
Consider including more examples/case studies
Conclusion (the most important section):
Under developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be?
In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Insufficient use of psychological theory about this topic
Insufficient understanding of the best available academic peer-reviewed literature on this topic is evident (e.g., many claims lack citation; where citations are used, there is an overreliance on a small number of citations such as Jones et al. (2015))
Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)
There is too much general theoretical material (e.g., about motivation). Instead, summarise and link to further information (such as other book chapters or Wikipedia articles), to allow this chapter to focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question).
Overall, the use of learning features is insufficient
No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
One image
Basic use of table(s)
One feature box
Basic use of quiz(zes)
No use of case studies
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Also link to related book chapters.
Basic use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Move scenario to start to help engage reader interest. Consider putting it into a feature box and including an image.
Abbreviate - keep it focused and snappy. Move detailed content into other sections.
One of the focus questions should be what is the HBM. Use the sub-title as a structuring device for the focus questions. And use the focus questions as a structuring device for the top-level headings.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
A few Wikiversity page edits have been made. Provide direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
Over the maximum word count. The content beyond 4000 words has been ignored for marking purposes.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of image(s)
Excellent use of table(s)
Excellent use of feature box(es)
Basic use of quiz(zes)
Very good use of case studies or examples
Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Very good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
The presentation addresses the topic
There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory, including limitations
The presentation makes no explicit use of relevant psychological research; ideally make more explicit use of research
Include citations to support claims
The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information
The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.