Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (e.g., by expanding the structure for the critical section about the relationship)
Health interventions section not required - but these could be excellent areas for case studies/applied examples
Promising alignment between focus questions and heading structure
Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples
Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, you have taken a really interesting approach to this topic, I especially like how you have separated the sections into each addiction. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic that might be relevant? Additionally, I would consider adding interactive quizzes for each addition. --U3224582 (discuss • contribs) 05:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence.
Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences.
Layout
The chapter is well structured
Avoid having sections with 1 sub-section
Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard
Excellent/Very good/Good/Basic/Insufficient use of learning features
Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Basic use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of case studies or examples
No use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point
The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides
The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
The presentation could be strengthened by adding some more text (e.g., about take-home messages)
The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams
Also consider using diagrams
The presentation is well produced using simple tools
The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) but could be strengthened by making more explicit use of the best psychological research about this topic
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A written description of the presentation is provided
Links to and from the book chapter are provided
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features