Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Dark tetrad and emotion

Initial suggestions

@U3214333: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Dark triad
• What psychological theories can help to understand? What is the main research in this area?

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi U3214333. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded The sub-title is correctly worded The capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents. The capitalisation of the sub-title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Quizzes doesn't need a heading - just embed any relevant questions in their respective section(s) Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure Overview Basic development Consider adding: a brief, evocative description of the problem an example or case study Use bullet-points for focus questions (for how, see Tutorial 01) Focus questions should end with question marks Remove overcapitalisation e.g., Dark Tetrad -> dark tetrad Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Consider using a table to summary key emotional aspects of the DT traits Promising balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed Figure Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view Learning feature Promising use of quiz question(s). Check wording/grammar. Also consider including in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapter References Good Move non-peer-reviewed sources to external links For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Excellent External links Useful link Include at least 1 more for topic development; more for book chapter User page Created, but not developed Add description about self Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Add link to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Other Book Chapters

Hello, here is another book chapter that relates to your topic that is being worked on. You two could link up with each other on some of the material.

Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Dark tetrad and motivation

Thanks

u3217955

U3217955 (discuss • contribs) 03:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Social Contribution Suggestion

Hey there,

I would love to see a table to display the difference between narcissism, psychopathy, machiavellians and sadism and the different emotions linked to them before going into detail about them. Potentially also some images to show what each emotion is/looks like. Mia Pearse (discuss • contribs) 05:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation takes a surprisingly typist view (as opposed to trait view) of the dark triad The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research Some citations are included to support claims The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with a basic summary What are the practical take-home message(s) that we can use to help improve our everyday lives based on the best available psychological theory and research about this topic? The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Audio communication is reasonably well paced Basic intonation Consider using greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement Audio recording quality was very good Audio recording volume was reasonably quiet. Consider getting closer to microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content) Video Overall, visual display quality is reasonably good The presentation makes reasonably good use of mostly text and some image based slides The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good chapter. It makes excellent use of psychological theory and basic use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Underdeveloped Engage reader interest by presenting a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon Basic focus questions Use open-ended rather than closed-ended focus questions Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on related Wikipedia articles Build more strongly on related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Effective use of tables, figures, and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Basic use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Consider using more examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Basic review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Basic integration between theory and research Conclusion Reasonably good summary and conclusion Remind the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest Key points are summarised Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Express numbers < 10 using words (e.g., two) and >= 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 99) Figures Figures are very well captioned Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Tables Use APA style for captions. See example Refer to each Table using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Citations use correct APA style Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section References use very good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[1] Learning features Basic use of learning features Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Move links to non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Good use of image(s) Good use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Basic use of case studies or examples Very basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Good/ use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use sentence casing Add more links Good use of external links in the "External links" section Add more links Social contribution No logged social contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)