Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development
In particular, the chapter focuses on happiness (joy might be a better term - happiness is a broader concept), sadness, and fear, but does not cover disgust, anger, or interest. So provide less detail about those few core emotions and more coverage of the other core emotions. Aim for a balanced coverage.
Rather than present Ekman's model, Plutchik's model etc. separately, consider presenting a synthesis that draws on these theories/research
Quiz yourself does not need a heading; just embed quiz questions in their most relevant section
Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
Generally well cited, but this is inconsistent and there is a lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations in some places (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of image(s)
Very good use of table(s)
Excellent use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Excellent use of case studies or examples
Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
Links to and from the book chapter are provided
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features