Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Emotional intelligence training

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

General comment[edit source]

Hi there, really interesting topic and I can certainly understand how beneficial it would be in certain workplaces. One thing I never really considered was how being trained in EI can benefit ones own health. One study found that after participants completed a programme in EI training, not only did they increase in EI, but they also significantly improved in measures of health and wellbeing. Here is a link to the study. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/smi.979?casa_token=Lw51d0VfNVkAAAAA:8agJfV3ZdlHcoxMxMhDNbnbVUnaZIglGN1hmP2gSD4E_Mz7et0ebZazade4c9qUqU1DtOW2W_ubpgA All the best. --U3162449 (discusscontribs) 01:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments[edit source]

Hi there, Your chapter looks like it will be really interesting to read- i look forward to it. I have edited a few minor spelling mistakes and changed a few sentences to make them flow a bit better. I recommended having another read over some of the work as quite a few paragraphs are disjointed and don't quite make sense although im sure it will all tie together when you getfurther along. i look forward to reading this!- kskrivs


Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Autoroute icone.svg

Title, sub-title, TOC[edit source]

  1. Not provided; has now been added

User page[edit source]

  1. Not created

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. None summarised on user page

Section headings[edit source]

  1. None provided

Key points[edit source]

  1. None provided

Image[edit source]

  1. None provided

References[edit source]

  1. None provided

Resources[edit source]

  1. None provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit source]

  1. This chapter is incomplete.
  2. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Insufficient

Research[edit source]

  1. Some statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
  2. Insufficient

Written expression[edit source]

  1. The quality of written expression is poor
    1. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences.
    2. Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses.
  2. Layout is insufficient/incomplete
  3. Learning features are lacking
  4. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading.
    1. Check and make correct use of commas.
  5. APA style
    1. References are not in full APA style e.g.,
      1. Check and make correct use of capitalisation.

(2018)

Heading casing[edit source]

Crystal Clear app ktip.svg
FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings (or sentence casing). For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:21, 29 September 2019 (UTC)


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Autoroute icone.svg

Title and sub-title[edit source]

  1. Wording of the title/sub-title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents

User page[edit source]

  1. Created, with description about self and link to book chapter
  2. Used effectively

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Summarised with direct links to evidence.

Section headings[edit source]

  1. Underdeveloped - could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure.
  2. See earlier comment about Heading casing.
  3. Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  4. Gender differences is not part of the question.

Key points[edit source]

  1. Under-developed
  2. Remove or adapt generic template content.
  3. Overview - Consider adding focus questions.
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
  5. Consider introducing a case study in the Overview.
  6. Consider including more examples/case studies.
  7. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section.

Image[edit source]

  1. An image (figure) is presented.
  2. Caption uses APA style.
  3. Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text.
  4. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.
  5. Consider increasing image size from default.

References[edit source]

  1. Less than 3.
  2. User primary peer-reviewed sources rather than the textbook.
  3. Use APA style.

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Good
    2. Also link to relevant book chapters
  2. External links
    1. OK - see reformatting

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:21, 29 September 2019 (UTC)