Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship/Guy vandegrift

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Guy vandegrift (talk • email • contribs • stats • logs • global account)[edit source]

I'd like to nominate Guy vandegrift for probationary custodianship. Guy is a prolific editor at both Wikiversity and Wikipedia, and active at Wikibooks and Commons. He has shown a consistent interest in improving Wikiversity, interacts well with other users in support of their project ideas, and has always been willing to accept constructive criticism in return. -- Dave Braunschweig (discusscontribs) 17:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Questions[edit source]

Comments[edit source]

Custodians willing to mentor[edit source]

I am willing to mentor. Guy has indicated his willingness / acceptance at [1]. -- Dave Braunschweig (discusscontribs) 17:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

checkY Done[2] - Guy vandegrift is now a probationary custodian. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Recommendation for full custodian status[edit source]

I would like to nominate User:Guy vandegrift for full custodian status. Guy has been a probationary custodian for five months, and has demonstrated a consistent dedication to improving Wikiversity and collaborating effectively with others. Please discuss and indicate your views below. -- Dave Braunschweig (discusscontribs) 13:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion and questions[edit source]

Questions to and discussion of the candidate.

  • Guy has been consistently responsive and thoughtful, responding to complaints or corrections, always positively. I also recommend him for full custodian status, he has had better training from Dave than I've ever seen be done before. Mostly mentors go away and do something else and pay little attention to what the mentee does. Dave has, then, himself, gone above and beyond the normal. --Abd (discusscontribs) 16:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Voting for full custodianship[edit source]

Discussions are archived for review purposes. Please start a new discussion to discuss the topic further.