Template:METF/2023
Feedback template for the topic development exercise for the motivation and emotion unit. Designed to be transcluded on a chapter talk page.
Simple example
| ||
---|---|---|
Simple exampleSee also detailed example <!-- Official topic development feedback --> {{METF/2023 |1= <!-- Title --> # |2= <!-- Headings --> # |3= <!-- Overview --> # |4= <!-- Key points--> # |5= <!-- Figure --> # |6= <!-- Learning feature --> # |7= <!-- References --> # |8= <!-- Resources --> # |9= <!-- User page --> # |10= <!-- Social contribution --> # }} ~~~~ gives
Topic development feedback
|
Detailed example
Example use of the template which includes commonly used feedback comments:
<!-- Official topic development feedback --> {{METF/2023 |1= <!-- Title --> # The title is correctly worded and formatted # The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted # The wording and/or capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2023|book table of contents]]. # The wording and/or capitalisation of the sub-title is incorrect. Be consistent with the [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2023|book table of contents]]. # Remove user name – authorship is as per the list of topics and the page's editing history |2= <!-- Headings --> # See earlier comment about [[#heading casing|Heading casing]] # Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic # Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure # Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure # Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure # Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for the larger section(s) # Overly complicated 3-level structure – consider simplifying # Messy heading structure – needs work # Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure # Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings # Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings # Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections # The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings # Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.) # Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings # Definition(s) is a pedestrian heading. Incorporate definition material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information. # Case study doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed case study within relevant sections # Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections |3= <!-- Overview--> # Simplify/abbreviate - move detail into subsequent sections # Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions # A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section # Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest # Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest # Add a scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest # A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided # A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned # Description of the problem/topic should be brief and evocative. Keep this section user-friendly. Move detail into subsequent section. # Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic # Make this section user-friendly. Move details into a subsequent question. # Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios) # Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings # Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended # Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions # Use single- rather than double-barrelled focus questions # Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section |4= <!-- Key points--> # Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations # Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations # Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations # Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations # For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings # ''Avoid providing too much background information''. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on ''directly answering the core question(s)'' posed by the chapter sub-title. # Good balance of theory and research # Promising balance of theory and research. Ideally, synthesise and provide examples. # There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research # Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples # Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year) # Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, write in your own words # Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – [https://polishedpaper.com/blog/capitalization-apa-style more info] # Write the chapter using [https://www.aresearchguide.com/write-in-third-person.html 3rd person perspective], although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective # Use [https://www.abc.net.au/education/learn-english/australian-vs-american-spelling/11244196 Australian spelling] (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour) # Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body. # It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan # Is this [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Using generative AI|genAI content]]? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries otherwise it violates academic integrity. # Conclusion (the most important section): ## Well developed ## Underway ## Under developed ## Hasn't been developed ## What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) # Generally well-written, but I recommend using the [https://uclearn.canberra.edu.au/courses/501/external_tools/262?display=borderless Studiosity] service and/or a service like [https://www.grammarly.com/ Grammarly] to help improve the quality of written expression because there are a lot of grammatical and spelling errors. |5= <!-- Figure --> # Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited # A relevant figure is presented and captioned # Well done on creating and uploading your own image! {{smile}} – this can also be listed as a social contribution # A relevant figure is presented # A relevant figure is not presented and cited # The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text # Caption should include ''Figure X''. ... # Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text # Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text # Cite each figure at least once in the main text # Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view # Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text |6= <!-- Learning feature --> # Excellent use of in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters # Promising use of in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters # One use of in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters # Include in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters # Excellent use of example(s)/case study(ies) # Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) # Promising use of quiz question(s) # Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question # Promising use of table(s) # Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information # Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. |7= <!-- References --> # Excellent # Very good # Good # OK # Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links # Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? # For [https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf APA referencing style], check and correct: ## alphabetical order ## capitalisation ## [[Help:Wikitext quick reference|italicisation]] ## [https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf doi formatting] ## make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) ## page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) # None # Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic # Use either APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both. Currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used. |8= <!-- Resources --> # See also ## Excellent ## Very good ## OK ## One of out of two links provided ## Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]) ## Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]] ## Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]) ## Include source in brackets after link ## Include "(Book chapter, year)" after links to other motivation and emotion book chapters on Wikiversity ## Also link to related book chapters ## Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages ## Not developed # External links ## Excellent ## Very good ## OK ## Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]) ## Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]] ## Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]) ## Include source in brackets after link ## Only include links directly related to the sub-title ## Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population ## Not developed # Good choice of links, but poorly formatted (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]) |9= <!-- User page --> # Excellent – used effectively # Very good # Good # Created – minimal, but sufficient # Not created – see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]] # Excellent description about self provided # Description about self provided # Brief description about self provided – consider expanding # Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding # Add description about self # Link(s) provided to professional profile(s) # Consider linking to your [https://portfolio.canberra.edu.au/ eportfolio] page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as [https://www.linkedin.com/ LinkedIn]. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. # Link provided to book chapter # Link provided to book chapter (rename to make it more user-friendly) # Add link to book chapter |10= <!-- Social contribution --> # Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence # At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence # If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#Making and summarising social contributions|Making and summarising social contributions]]. # Great to see you on X (formally known as Twitter)! # Use a numbered list (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]) # Add a brief summary of each contribution # None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Physiological needs#Social contributions|Tutorial 03]]. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#socialcontribution|social contributions]]. }} ~~~~
gives
Topic development feedback
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date. |
|