Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Work motivation and self-determination theory

Heading casing

Hi U3212278. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Basic, 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections 3. Overview Basic Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest A description of the problem/topic is planned Keep it simple Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions 4. Key points Partial development of key points Basic use of citations Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) 6. Learning feature Promising in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters Basic use of scenario/example/case study Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: Remove bullet-points page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) None 8. Resources See also Excellent Use sentence casing External links Excellent Use sentence casing 9. User page Good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions. To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. This was demonstrated in tutorials.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggested studies

Hey, here are some more studies to get the ball rolling with your chapter.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Legault, L. (2020). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 4694-4702). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101860. Annabelle Taylor (discuss • contribs) 02:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient chapter mainly because it lacks sufficient review of relevant research Reasonably good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box; also include a relevant image Consider using the scenario to illustrate key components of SDT Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Basic focus questions Use open-ended rather than closed-ended focus questions The focus questions are distributed throughout the chapter rather than being synthesised and presented at the end of the Overview Theory Basic coverage of relevant theory Builds somewhat on previous, related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Basic depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) It would be helpful to point out that SDT is a macro theory which consists of half a dozen mini-theories Use tables, figures, and/or lists are to help convey key theoretical information Very basic use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts; lacks depth Research Insufficient review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Insufficient integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research Conclusion Basic summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Avoid having a single sub-heading within a section Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[2]. Video (1 min) Figures Figures are reasonably well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). For example: Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses References use reasonably good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Include hyperlinked dois (fixed) Remove numbers Learning features Basic use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Only link the first time the word/phrase is used. Basic use of image(s) Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use alphabetical order Good use of external links in the "External links" section It would be ideal if these links were more specific to WM and SDT Use alphabetical order Social contribution ~7 logged, useful, minor social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed but not narrated The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest (e.g., by introducing a case study or scenario) Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation somewhat addresses the topic Mostly this is a general presentation about SDT; expand the application to work motivation An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research The claimed findings about the role of money as a work motivator are overly simplistic Ideally, make more explicit use of research about this topic The presentation makes basic use of citations to support claims The presentation makes no use of examples The presentation could be improved by providing practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a very basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Reasonably good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was very quiet Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is reasonably well matched to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic Video Overall, visual display quality is basic The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams The visual communication could be improved by including more relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is reasonably well matched to the target topic Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)