Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
I like this 2-level heading structure. It is pragmatic, clear, and interesting. However, make sure that it is used to synthesise the best psychological theory and research about this topic.
Adjust the 2nd-level heading up (currently uses level 5 style)
Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure
Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
I seem to recall some interesting research about play between dominant and submissive rats. The dominant rat doesn't try too hard so that there is more fun.
Use APA style 7th ed. for citations (e.g., et al. for 3 more authors)
Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
Conclusion (the most important section):
Under developed
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.