Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi,
Great chapter so far I can see you've got a great structure to add the rest of your information. It looks like you might not have found or added external links yet. I found a handful relating to your topic if you'd like to explore them and add any!
Hi Rachel Condat so far you have put together such an insightful book chapter! Well done (:
Here are some feedback/suggestion points I have for you:
You have done well in providing a comprehensive chapter covering multiple components of PTSD and emotion, including neurobiological, cognitive, and behavioural causes.
You have made good use in providing realistic scenarios and integrating various psychological theories.
Maybe consider providing more multimedia to break up text content for a holistic learning experience.
Don't forget to add the hanging indents to your references too!
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
Avoid providing too much background/tangential information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence
The other type of contribution ia making:
comments on chapters (past or current)
If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
A reasonably good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
The main issue is too much focus on "PTSD and memory" rather on the topic which is "PTSD and emotion", although they understandably are related and the focus on "PTSD and memory and emotion" is relevant and useful
There was room to discuss treatment for PTSD in relation to emotion. What works?
Consider linking to the corresponding chapter about post-traumatic growth
Builds somewhat on Wikipedia articles; build more strongly on related book chapters
Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
Basic use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information
Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Some use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity
Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance
Abbreviations
Once an abbreviation has been established (e.g., PTSD), use it consistently aftwarwards
Spelling
Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.
Proofreading
More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard
Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of image(s)
Basic use of table(s)
Good use of feature box(es)
Very good use of case studies or examples
Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
One use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Very good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 18 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio
Audio communication is reasonably well paced
Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
The question mark is missing from the title/sub-title
An excellent written description of the presentation is provided
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features)