Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Post-traumatic stress disorder and emotion

Suggestion

Hi, Great chapter so far I can see you've got a great structure to add the rest of your information. It looks like you might not have found or added external links yet. I found a handful relating to your topic if you'd like to explore them and add any!

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i25xx_Gaew
• https://www.beyondblue.org.au/
• https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/what-are-symptoms-ptsd
• https://www.pickingupthepeaces.org.au/ptsd-disorder/ptsd-symptoms/living-with-ptsd/
• https://psychscenehub.com/psychinsights/-post-traumatic-stress-disorder/
• https://www.ptsd.va.gov/family/how_family_member.asp
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEHDQeIRTgs

Best of luck U3243508 (discuss • contribs) 3:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Rachel Condat so far you have put together such an insightful book chapter! Well done (: Here are some feedback/suggestion points I have for you:

You have done well in providing a comprehensive chapter covering multiple components of PTSD and emotion, including neurobiological, cognitive, and behavioural causes.

You have made good use in providing realistic scenarios and integrating various psychological theories.

Maybe consider providing more multimedia to break up text content for a holistic learning experience.

Don't forget to add the hanging indents to your references too!

Wishing you the best of luck! --U3236641 (discuss • contribs) 22:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Question

Would you consider comparing PTSD to c-PTSD (complex PTSD)? It's a fairly new concept and if it is relevant to your topic perhaps you could compare the two. U3229926 (discuss • contribs) 07:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted. This has been corrected. User name removed – authorship is as per the list of topics and the page's editing history 2. Headings Well developed 3-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Maybe be overly complicated since key points haven't been developed for each section. Consider simplifying (e.g., drop the 3rd level of heading). The formatting for the 2nd and 3rd level of heading is not correct (it uses something like 5th-level format) Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended There are too many focus questions - I've removed the three least important ones. Suggest further refinement. 4. Key points Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Avoid providing too much background/tangential information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples Avoid overcapitalisation (use APA style) Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure A relevant figure is presented and captioned Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view 6. Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question Promising use of table(s) Focus the tables on addressing the focus questions; better off linking to the Wikipedia article about PTSD for this sort of information 7. References OK Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting only the doi should be an active hyperlink page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) 8. Resources See also OK Move the external links into a new section at the end called "External links" Include source in brackets after link Also link to related book chapters 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence The other type of contribution ia making: comments on chapters (past or current) If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi Rachel Condat. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter A key area for potential improvement is the quality of written expression Reasonably good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims Better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Explains the problem or phenomenon Clear focus questions Theory A reasonably good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained The main issue is too much focus on "PTSD and memory" rather on the topic which is "PTSD and emotion", although they understandably are related and the focus on "PTSD and memory and emotion" is relevant and useful There was room to discuss treatment for PTSD in relation to emotion. What works? Consider linking to the corresponding chapter about post-traumatic growth Builds somewhat on Wikipedia articles; build more strongly on related book chapters Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Basic use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Some use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) in many places Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is reasonably good Layout Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar The grammar for many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Abbreviations Once an abbreviation has been established (e.g., PTSD), use it consistently aftwarwards Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[1]. Video (1 min) Figures Well captioned Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Tables Table 1 is overly detailed. Summarise key points more succinctly. Table captions use APA style or wiki style Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1) Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.) References use basic APA style: Provide full journal titles Include hyperlinked dois (fixed) Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct spelling Learning features Reasonably good use of learning features Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s) Basic use of table(s) Good use of feature box(es) Very good use of case studies or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) One use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Use alphabetical order Social contribution ~2 logged, useful, moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence 1 contribution without direct links to evidence; ignored for marking purposes Use a numbered list per Tutorial 02

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)