Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Morbid curiosity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Initial suggestions

[edit source]

@Scarlett Neilson: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed)
  1. Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for larger section(s)
  2. Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
  3. Unclear how media relates to the sub-title; but media could be used as an interesting example
  4. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Add a scenario or case study in a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  3. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections
  2. Insufficient use of citations
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. Conclusion (the most important section) is underdeveloped
  5. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. The figure caption should use APA style (e.g., start with Figure 1.)
  4. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Consider use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. OK
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. All references need to be cited in the text
  4. Only include references which have been accessed and read
  5. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. author initials (instead of first names)
    2. remove quotation marks
    3. capitalisation
    4. italicisation
    5. provide all available dois and make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
  1. See also
    1. Very good
    2. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use sentence casing
  1. Basic – minimal – see Tutorial 02
  2. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Add description about self
  4. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  5. A link to the book chapter is provided
  6. Rename the link to the book chapter to make it more user-friendly (see Tutorial 02)
  1. Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with indirect link(s) to evidence. The other type of contribution is making:
  2. To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply