Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Moral dilemmas and emotion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed title; adjusted sub-title in list of all topics because I prefer the new sub-title you've suggested)
  1. Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for larger section(s)
  2. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Add a scenario or case study in a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned
  3. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment
  4. Consider abbreviating the longest focus question
  1. Promising development of key points for most sections, with some relevant citations
  2. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  3. Use APA style 7th edition for citations
  4. Use Australian spelling (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour)
  5. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Under developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. A relevant figure is presented and captioned
  2. Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style
  4. Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view
  5. Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution
  1. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of one ore more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. OK
  2. 4 out of 6
  3. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  4. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  5. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. doi formatting
    4. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    5. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  6. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  1. See also
    1. One of two link types provided
      1. Also link to related book chapters
    2. Use alphabetical order
  2. External links
    1. Not developed
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. Created – minimal, but sufficient
  5. Not created – see Tutorial 02
  6. Brief description about self – consider expanding
  7. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  8. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. The other types of contribution are making:
    1. comments on chapters (past or current)
    2. posts about the unit or project on other platforms

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply