Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Learned industriousness and motivation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. Excellent – Well developed 1-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic.
  2. Consider expanding to a 2-level heading structure, with sub-headings
  3. Very good alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure, but there may be room for improvement
  4. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Very good
  2. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  3. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is planned
  4. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  5. Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions
  1. Promising development of key points for each section
  2. Excellent use of citations
  3. Promising balance of theory and research
  4. Use APA style 7th edition for citations (e.g., do not include author initials)
  5. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed
  6. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  1. Add in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Excellent use of quiz question(s)
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. OK
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Only include references which have been accessed and read
  4. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. alphabetical order
    2. capitalisation
    3. italicisation
    4. use dois instead of other reference numbers
    5. remove publisher location
    6. check formatting of author initials
    7. provide full journal titles
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use sentence casing
    3. Use alphabetical order
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity comments: view the talk page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply