Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Intentional pregnancy motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heading casing

Hi Biancagouws. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

~~~~


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic.
  3. Consider integrating the religious and cultural section (e.g., tradition and ritual is often closely associated with religious); both of which are arguably a sub-set of social motivations
  4. Excellent alignment between focus questions and heading structure
  1. Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
  2. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  3. Simplify/abbreviate. Make this section more user-friendly. Move detail into subsequent sections.
  4. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  1. Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. The key points could be strengthened by providing more citations to psychological science
  3. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  4. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples
  5. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Underway
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  2. Use APA style (i.e., capitalise Figure)
  1. Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  3. Consider including more quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. Insufficient
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  4. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. alphabetical order
    2. capitalisation
    3. italicisation
    4. doi formatting
    5. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    6. use dois where available instead of other links
  5. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. OK
    2. Move academic sources into references and cite
  1. Used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. At least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply