Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Inner voice and motivation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Feedback

[edit source]

Hi U3248317, good luck with the assignment!

I think it would be really interesting to understand more about the impact of childhood on inner voice and motivation. For example, can practices that parents have with their children (like positive affirmations) influence a child's inner voice?

It would also be interesting to see if there has been anything you could reference to inside out as a way of engaging with individuals reading your book chapter. I use inside out and the emotions to engage with my own kids.

Looking forward to reading this chapter!

Mel U3225022 (discusscontribs) 03:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion

[edit source]

Hi @U3248317,

Have you heard of aphantasia? It's not exactly an inner "voice" but it is a condition related to inner-thoughts and conceptualisation.

Hope it helps! U3249300 (discusscontribs) 03:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing

[edit source]
Hi U3248317. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
  3. Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  4. "Motivation" heading isn't necessary. Provide this information in Overview or move into subsequent sections. Or move 4, 5, 6 underneath as sub-headings.
  1. Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
  2. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
  3. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  1. Promising development of key points
  2. Excellent use of citations
  3. Good balance of theory and research
  1. Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info
  2. Does this plan include genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  3. Conclusion reads like unacknowledged genAI content
  4. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text (e.g., add something about IV)
  3. Use APA style for figure captions
  4. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  1. Promising in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters
  2. Excellent use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Excellent use of quiz question(s)
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Good
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Very good
    2. Use alphabetical order
  2. External links
    1. To be developed (see Tutorial 2)
  1. Good
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making:

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a very good presentation
  1. The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a very good way
  2. The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
  3. A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example
  4. Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological research
  6. The presentation makes good use of citations to support claims
  7. The presentation makes basic use of examples
  8. The presentation provides basic practical advice
  9. The presentation provides easy to understand information
  1. The conclusion provides an excellent summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic
  2. The conclusion provides excellent take-home message(s)
  3. The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
  4. The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit
  1. The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio
  2. Audio communication is well-paced
  3. Reasonably good intonation
  4. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  5. Audio recording quality was very good
  6. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic
  1. Overall, visual display quality is very good
  2. The presentation makes very good use of text and image based slides
  3. References not provided
  4. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  5. Consider increasing line spacing to make the text easier to read
  6. The amount of text presented per slide makes it reasonably easy to read and listen at the same time
  7. The visual communication is supplemented in an very good way by relevant images and/or diagrams
  8. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  9. The visual content is well matched to the target topic
  1. The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation

t

  1. Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers
  2. References not provided
  3. A link to the book chapter is not provided
  4. A link from the book chapter is provided
  5. The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. Image sources are communicated in a general way
  3. Provide clickable links to the image sources and license details (e.g., in the description)
  4. Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated
  5. A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated
  6. A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field
  7. A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply