Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Humiliation

Heading casing

Hi Stluciamolly. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Stluciamolly (discuss • contribs) 05:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The sub-title wording has been corrected to match the list of all topics 2. Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section Simplify/abbreviate. Make this section more user-friendly. Move detail into subsequent sections. Promising focus questions. The sub-title suggests three focus questions. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations The main challenge is likely to be synthesising this chapter down to the maximum word count, since the topic development plan is basically already at that point. So, you'll need to very judicious in your choice of what to include (what is essential to address the focus questions using the best psychological science?) and what is interesting but not essential (to be left out) Good balance of theory and research Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year) Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, write in your own words Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure A relevant figure is presented and captioned Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text (i.e., mention humiliation) Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text 6. Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Excellent use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Very good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? alphabetical order capitalisation italicisation 8. Resources See also Very good Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02) External links Very good Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02) Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Very good Good Created – minimal, but sufficient Not created – see Tutorial 02 Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence The other types of contribution are making: comments on chapters (past or current)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)