Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Environmental cues and habits

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Articles that might be helpful

[edit source]

Hey @MoniqqueK! I ran into this article which discusses how the environment of a metropolitan urban area affects the likelihood of individuals picking up a cycling habit. They've got a massive sample size, so I figured it might be of some use for you. See here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.02.007. D. E. Finlay (discusscontribs) 04:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is great! Thank you so much MoniqqueK (discusscontribs) 02:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Initial suggestions

[edit source]

@MoniqqueK: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic.
  2. Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
  3. Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections
  1. Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
  2. Consider abbreviating
  3. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
  4. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  5. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section
  2. Very good use of citations
  3. Good balance of theory and research
  4. A key challenge might be fitting within the maximum word count, so work out what is essential and what is just a nice to have
  5. Conclusion is underway
  6. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  4. Cite each figure using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Use internal rather than external linking style for Wikipedia links
  3. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  4. Excellent use of quiz question(s)
  5. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Excellent
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters) (fixed)
    3. Use internal linking style for Wikipedia links
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Use alphabetical order
  1. Very good
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. At least three different types of contributions with mostly direct link(s) to evidence
  2. To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity comments: view the talk page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply