Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Environmental cues and habits

Articles that might be helpful

Hey @MoniqqueK! I ran into this article which discusses how the environment of a metropolitan urban area affects the likelihood of individuals picking up a cycling habit. They've got a massive sample size, so I figured it might be of some use for you. See here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.02.007. D. E. Finlay (discuss • contribs) 04:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

This is great! Thank you so much MoniqqueK (discuss • contribs) 02:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Initial suggestions

@MoniqqueK: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Behaviour
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Environment
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Habit
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections 3. Overview Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions Consider abbreviating A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section Very good use of citations Good balance of theory and research A key challenge might be fitting within the maximum word count, so work out what is essential and what is just a nice to have Conclusion is underway What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text Cite each figure using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) 6. Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Use internal rather than external linking style for Wikipedia links Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Excellent use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Excellent Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) 8. Resources See also Excellent Include source in brackets after link (e.g., (Wikipedia) or (Book chapter, year) for Wikiversity book chapters) (fixed) Use internal linking style for Wikipedia links External links Excellent Use alphabetical order 9. User page Very good Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution At least three different types of contributions with mostly direct link(s) to evidence To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity comments: view the talk page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Neurology and Habit

Hey @MoniqqueK! I noticed that you're leaning on a significant amount of neurological mechanisms in your discussion of habit formation. I was wondering if it would be worth discussing the memory centres of the brain alongside the executive function centres. Baladron and Hamker, 2020, (see here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ejn.14730) explored the relationship between habit and hippocampal structures in rats. --DFaol (discuss • contribs) 03:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

External source suggestion

Hi, super interesting chapter so far! I was just thinking James Clears book Atomic Habits explains habit formation and environmental cues super well in a pop-psychology/ lay term way. Even though it's mostly about habit stacking, it might be a beneficial external source for explaining the basics to people. If you were interested in including it as a source for readers heres a link to James website: https://jamesclear.com/atomic-habits U3239091 (discuss • contribs) 23:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

social contribution

hey, you've done a great job writing the chapter clearly, and I really appreciate the link you've made between environmental cues and building positive habits. One suggestion to consider is expanding on how changing/ removing environmental cues can help break unhealthy habits. This could add to the understanding of how habits are formed and disrupted great work so far :) U3236683 (discuss • contribs) 20:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation The presentation is under the maximum time limit (3 mins). Room for further development. Overview The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a basic way The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A basic context for the presentation is established Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation somewhat addresses the topic The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes insufficient/no use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes insufficient/no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of examples The presentation provides useful practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a reasonably good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides basic take-home message(s) Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Audio communication is reasonably well-paced Consider using longer pauses at the end of sentences Basic intonation The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was reasonably good The narrated content is reasonably well matched to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic Video Overall, visual display quality is good The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is reasonably well matched to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation An excellent written description of the presentation is provided A link to the book chapter is not provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. I suspect that some of this chapter is based on unacknowledged use of genAI output; if so, it violates academic integrity principles Good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon The focus questions are excellent (clear and relevant) Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on other chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Good use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Reasonably good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Clear take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent Bullet points are overused. Develop more of the bullet point statements into full sentences and paragraphs. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Not all sub-headings are implemented using wiki-style headings, so they don't appear in the table of contents The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) APA style Use serial commas[2]. Video (1 min) Citations use excellent APA Style (7th ed.) References use excellent APA style Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles Reasonably good use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Good use of figure(s) No use of table(s) Reasonably good use of feature box(es) Very good use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than as a set of questions at the end Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use alphabetical order Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Use alphabetical order Add more links Social contribution ~4 logged, useful, mostly moderate contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)