Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Effort justification

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
  3. Rename or remove "Introduction". The Overview should do this job. Or rename/restructure to be more specific.
  4. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  1. Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
  2. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
  3. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  4. Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  3. Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  4. Good balance of theory and research
  5. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Well developed
  1. One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned
  2. The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Excellent use of quiz question(s)
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Very good
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. italicisation
    2. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
  1. See also
    1. Good
    2. One of two link types provided
      1. Also link to related book chapters
  2. External links
    1. One of two required external links provided
    2. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    3. Include source in brackets after link
  1. Basic – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Add link to book chapter
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply