Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Dopamine fasting

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

My recommendation:

[edit source]

Hi @emdawson02! I really like your initial example of friend A and friend B, but I thought it could be even more engaging if you included an image of two friends to give the scenario some imagery :) Keep up the good work! Emeweme (discusscontribs) 04:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing

[edit source]
Hi Emdawson02. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed)
  2. User name removed – authorship is as per the list of topics and the page's editing history
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
  3. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  4. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section
  2. Explain the connection between the scenario and the topic (DF and M/E)
  3. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  5. These focus questions are too broad/unrelated to the target topic (see the sub-title and unpack it to allow you to synthesise the best psychological science that answers the sub-title question)
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. Too much about definitional/tangential matters; too little about the relationship between DF and M/E
  3. Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  4. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  5. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  6. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Under developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) but ideally make it more obvious how the scenario relates to a take-away message
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. Insufficient
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  4. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. italicisation
    2. doi formatting
  5. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  1. See also
    1. OK
    2. One of two link types provided
    3. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    4. Include source in brackets after link
    5. Include "(Book chapter, year)" after links to other motivation and emotion book chapters on Wikiversity
    6. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
    7. Use alphabetical order
  2. External links
    1. Not developed
  1. Created – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. One out of three types of contributions made with with indirect link(s) to evidence
  2. The other types of contribution are making:
    1. direct improvements to other book chapters (past or current)
    2. posts about the unit or project on other platforms
  3. If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply