Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Ayahuasca and the brain

Initial suggestions

@Mkatemoore: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Drugs
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Neuroscience
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi Mkatemoore. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Further suggestion of useful Wikipage

@Mkatemoore your topic piqued my interest as I'm very interested in how Ayahuasca affects the brain!

Further to James' comment, I just stumbled across this chapter from a previous year which might be helpful -

Ayahuasca and emotion

Good luck :) Beabosborne (discuss • contribs) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Beabosborne (discuss • contribs) 11:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Very good 2-level heading structure To improve, simplify heading structure to focus on psychological neuroscience about A; drop/reduce un/less related topics (e.g., drug tourism). There is only just enough in the maximum word count to allow a good answer to the core question. Related to this, the topic isn't A and motivation and emotion. it is A and the brain (focusing on M and E aspects of the brain). Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but aim for closer alignment 3. Overview Good Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Replace questions about motivation and emotion with a question about affects on the brain/motivational and emotional experience Ethics question not central to this topic; only focus on directly relevant questions because there isn't scope is this exercise for additional material 4. Key points Insufficient development Insufficient use of citations Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan Note/check difference between affect and effect For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) presented Use APA style for figure captions Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view 6. Learning feature Excellent in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Promising use of quiz question(s) Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Move Wikipedia links to See also Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable) Use APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both. Currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used. 8. Resources See also Excellent External links To be developed (see Tutorial 2) 9. User page Good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Key Info: Ayahuasca and DMT

Hi there,

What an interesting topic! I am looking forward to reading the finished chapter.

Although your chapter is in the earlier stages of production, I wanted to share with you a very useful link to a peer reviewed journal that will give you some very key information regarding ayahuasca in the psychedelic sense and the therapeutic benefits:https://web-p-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=f9f388fc-dd1a-479f-98cb-14552d5a2679%40redis

if the link does not work, please see:

Kjellgren, A., Eriksson, A., & Norlander, T. (2009). Experiences of encounters with ayahuasca—“the vine of the soul”. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 41(4), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2009.10399767

It is crucial to understand that the therapeutic benefits that you talk about in your chapter regarding the ayahuasca plant are primarily attributed to the combination of ayahuasca and the plant DMT, not just the ayahuasca plant by itself, which is a very significant distinction this chapter should make.

The article provided puts all of that in context, which would be a great base for your discussion.

I hope that is helpful! Best of luck! Danikollas (discuss • contribs) 07:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

General Thoughts & Feedback

Hi!

Sorry for what might be somewhat late feedback on your chapter here.

I want to start off by saying you have written an incredibly interesting and well-spoken chapter on a great topic. It is well formatted and does not have any parts that stretch on for too long over any others. You also did a very thourough job at hyperlinking relevant pages and articles for new words and ideas that were brought into discussion when needed.

I also really love your use of having smaller individual quizzes at stop points throughout the chapter, rather than one big one towards the end. This does a great job at keeping the reader engaged and continuing to pay attention.

One of the only real suggestions I could possibly make, is perhaps lessening some of the wording for Figure 7 itself, to have it explained within your paragraph and then referenced to. But this is not a large issue and I do not think it takes away or distracts majorly as the context for it still makes sense.

Overall a great chapter and very well done/good luck for anything left with it.

StephenBlume (discuss • contribs) 11:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation The presentation is under the maximum time limit (3 mins). Room for further development. Overview The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a reasonably good way The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A basic context for the presentation is established Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes insufficient/no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of examples The presentation provides basic practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic Provide take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Excellent intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was very good The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is good The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation An excellent written description of the presentation is provided An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not clearly indicated A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good to very good chapter. It makes good use of psychological theory and research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Very good Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box; also include a relevant image (fixed) Briefly explains the psychological problem or phenomenon; provide more detail about the relationship between A and the brain The focus questions are insufficient The focus questions could be improved by: being less general and more specific to the topic (i.e., the sub-title) Theory A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds exceptionally well on other chapters and Wikipedia articles Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Very good use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Very good review of relevant research Good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Reasonably good integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Insufficient integration with chapters Conclusion Very good summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Address the focus questions Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Layout The structure is overly complicated; aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Introduction and Conclusion Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Move links from headings into their first mention in text Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Figures Very well captioned Use this format for captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption goes here in sentence casing. See example. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., "(see Figure 1)") Tables Add an APA style caption to each table Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1) Citations use basic APA Style (7th ed.). To improve: Do not include author first name or initials References use very good APA style: Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Very good use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Excellent use of figure(s) Basic use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Basic use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Reasonably good use of external links in the "External links" section Use alphabetical order Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, mostly moderate contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)