Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello u3200902, interesting topic, I imagine this must have a wide breadth of research. As a formatting suggestion, I noticed some of your subheadings have multiple words capitalised. In APA these headings can be lowercase after the first word, e.g. 3.4 Aggravated Assault would just be Aggravated assault. Also, the images may benefit from being labelled as Figures, e.g. Figure 1. Hope this helps, have fun with the rest of the chapter. U3227759 (discuss • contribs) 12:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. This is a strong recommendation. Zoom in on "How is testosterone associated with violent crime?" and expand this section and reduce all the other sections.
For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
Conclusion (the most important section):
Well underway
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there!
I've had a look at your chapter and it looks great so far - plenty of research, and you've laid it out in a really clear, easy to read manner. I did notice there was limited focus on the relationship between testosterone and violent crime, so I wanted to offer some suggestions of areas of research that may interest you.
Further focus on gender differences could also be interesting. This article outlined how in women, the interplay between testosterone and cortisol seem to have a greater effect on aggression than testosterone alone: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5942158/
Also, because you’re discussing potentially upsetting topics such as rape and physical assault, you might want to consider adding a content or trigger warning. Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Tragic optimism is a good example of how it was integrated into the page, and also providing a link to Lifeline.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
The presentation somewhat addresses the topic
This presentation could be improved by reducing the background information about testosterone and violent crime motivation as separate concepts and other definitional foci. Focus instead on the relationship between T and VC. Basically the presentation starts tackling the topic at 1:30 mins.
There is too much content presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory
The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research
Ideally, make more explicit use of research
The presentation includes citations to support claims
The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
The usability of the presentation could be improved by exporting to a commonly used video hosting platform such as YouTube or Vimeo
The visual content is reasonably well matched to the target topic (see content) but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Provide an informative description to help viewers decide whether they want to watch
A link to the book chapter is not provided
A link from the book chapter is provided
The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Insufficient use of relevant psychological theory about this topic
The chapter wanders off into discussion about irrelevant theory
Builds reasonably well on related Wikipedia articles
Build more strongly on related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)
There is too much background theory that does not have enough direct relevance to the topic e.g., "Testosterone replacement therapy and testosterone abuse" and "What constitutes violent crime?". The content in these sections would only matter if the material can be shown to be directly related to the relationship between T and VC. Otherwise, summarise more briefly and provided embedded links to further information.
The intrinsic/extrinsic motivation and crime, Maslow's hierarchy of needs, and power motivation material isn't relevant because it is not about testosterone. It is about motivation for violent crime which is not the topic.
The topic starts to be addressed about half-way through in the section titled "How is testosterone associated with violent crime?"
The topic really starts to be addressed with the sentence "Testosterone may increase aggressive behaviours, as it enhances activity in the amygdala when an individual perceives a threat." This is the beginning of two very useful paragraphs.
However, the chapter then wanders off to discuss aggression and crime without any reference to testosterone, so this material isn't useful."
The next useful material is in the section titled "Testosterone and incarceration"
Insufficient depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
Use tables, figures, and/or lists are to help convey key theoretical information
Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Basic use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
Consider using more examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour)
Proofreading
More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard
Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Very good use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Basic use of feature box(es)
Basic use of case studies or examples
Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
The quiz questions could be improved by being more focused on the key points and/or take-home messages
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than as a set of questions at the end
Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Use alphabetical order
Basic use of external links in the "External links" section
Be more targetted and focused in selection of the most relevant links to the topic